Paper · 2009 · Agronomy Journal

Corn Response to Conventional and Slow‐Release Nitrogen Fertilizers across a Claypan Landscape

A. J. Noellsch; P. P. Motavalli; K. A. Nelson; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
138
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improvement of N fertilizer recovery efficiency (NRE) is necessary to reduce excess N entering the environment and to increase economic returns. A 2‐yr field trial was established in 2005 in Northeast Missouri to determine the effects of conventional and slow‐release N fertilizer sources and landscape position (summit, sideslope, and low‐lying) on crop growth and NRE in corn ( Zea mays L.) in a claypan soil. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments at 168 kg N ha −1 consisted of pre‐plant applied and incorporated polymer‐coated urea (PCU), urea, 50% PCU/50% urea mix by weight, anhydrous ammonia (AA), and a nontreated control. Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low‐lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions. Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha −1 over urea in the low‐lying position in 2005 and 2006. Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low‐lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006. Based on the grain yield results in this research and different fertilizer cost and crop prices, gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant‐applied AA compared with urea in the low‐lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha −1 . These results demonstrate that targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low-lying position was often wetter than summit and sideslope positions in 2005 and 2006.

Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
wettere0
Setting
low‐lying positione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Gravimetric soil water content data in 2005 and 2006 indicated that the low‐lying position was often wetter than the summit and sideslope positions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–771 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia increased corn grain yield over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006.

Treatment
Anhydrous ammoniae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1470 to 1810 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
ureae0
Setting
low‐lying positione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha −1 over urea in the low‐lying position in 2005 and 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased corn grain yield over urea in the low-lying position in 2005 and 2006.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1470 to 1810 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anhydrous ammonia and PCU treatments increased grain yield 1470 to 1810 kg ha −1 over urea in the low‐lying position in 2005 and 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCU increased plant N uptake and NRE relative to urea in the low-lying position in 2005 but not 2006.

Treatment
PCUe0
Outcome
plant N uptake and NREe0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low‐lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AA increased plant N uptake and NRE relative to urea in the low-lying position in 2005 but not 2006.

Treatment
AAe0
Outcome
plant N uptake and NREe0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding increases in plant N uptake and NRE were observed in the low‐lying position in 2005 with use of PCU and AA compared to urea, but not in 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross profit differences for PCU and preplant AA versus urea in the low-lying position could range from $50 to $642 per hectare.

Outcome
gross profit differencese0
Value
$50 to $642 ha −1e0
Comparator
ureae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“gross profit differences for use of PCU and preplant‐applied AA compared with urea in the low‐lying position could range from $50 to $642 ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1304 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Targeted nitrogen fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase corn grain yields and profitability.

Outcome
grain yields and profitabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“targeted use of different N fertilizer sources in claypan landscapes may increase grain yields and profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑

ammonia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

ammonia · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

194 papers: 142 positive, 52 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

190 papers more in this group

See all 194 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.