Paper · 2010 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

Carrot ( Daucus carota L.) In Vitro Regeneration

Keramat Rabiei; Aleksey Polyakov; Mahmood Khodambashi; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Carrot ( Daucus carota L.) In Vitro Regeneration Experiments were carried out for optimization of conditions for morphogenic callus production and regeneration of carrot ( Daucus carota L.) using four cultivars cultivated in Iran. Hypocotyl segments were put on media supplemented with 0.2 mg·L -1 2,4-D for callus initiation and proliferation. Small portions of callus (25 mg) were cut and transferred to new media with different concentrations of 2,4-D including 0.2, 0.5 and 1 mg·L -1 . MS (Murashige & Skoog 1962) and MSm (Masuda et al. 1981) media were used in the experiments to identify the differences between these two media according to callus, embryoid and plantlet production. Obtained results showed that low level of 2,4-D (0.2 mg·L -1 ) was more effective in morphogenic callus production although higher amounts of it (0.5 mg·L -1 and 1 mg·L -1 ) caused more callus growth. Kinetin in concentration of 0.1 mg·L -1 was more effective for regeneration than BAP used in concentration 1 mg·L -1 especially according to embryoid production. MSm medium was more useful than MS for callus production and regeneration of carrot plantlets. Among tested cultivars Nantes Improved had more capability to produce viable plantlets.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low 2,4-D at 0.2 mg·L -1 was more effective for morphogenic callus.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
2,4-D (0.2 mg·L -1 )e0
Outcome
morphogenic callus productione0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low level of 2,4-D (0.2 mg·L -1 ) was more effective in morphogenic callus production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher 2,4-D at 0.5 and 1 mg·L -1 caused more callus growth.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
0.5 mg·L -1 and 1 mg·L -1e0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher amounts of it (0.5 mg·L -1 and 1 mg·L -1 ) caused more callus growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin at 0.1 mg·L -1 was better than BAP at 1 mg·L -1 for regeneration, especially embryoids.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
embryoide0
Treatment
Kinetin in concentration of 0.1 mg·L -1e0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
BAP used in concentration 1 mg·L -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin in concentration of 0.1 mg·L -1 was more effective for regeneration than BAP used in concentration 1 mg·L -1 especially according to embryoid production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSm medium was more useful than MS for carrot callus production and plantlet regeneration.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
MSm mediume0
Outcome
callus production and regeneration of carrot plantletse0
Direction
more usefule0
Comparator
MSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSm medium was more useful than MS for callus production and regeneration of carrot plantlets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nantes Improved produced more viable plantlets among tested cultivars.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Material
Nantes Improvede0
Outcome
capability to produce viable plantletse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among tested cultivars Nantes Improved had more capability to produce viable plantlets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

kinetin · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

in vitro · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.