Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

Divergent Alfalfa Root System Architecture is Maintained across Environment and Nutrient Supply

Michael P. Russelle; JoAnn F. S. Lamb

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant root system architecture can alter, and be altered by, soil fertility and other environmental conditions. We developed alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) populations selected for tap‐ or branch‐rooted architectures and determined responses to P supply and K placement in field experiments. In Exp. 1, populations representing the parental composite and progeny from first and second cycles of divergent selection were seeded on soils testing low to medium for available P and K, a sandy loam (Becker, MN) and a silt loam (Rosemount, MN). Experiment 2 was conducted at Becker and included only second cycle progeny. Phosphorus was added to one‐half of the plots by injection of KH 2 PO 4 (224 kg P ha −1 ) into the upper 40 cm of soil. On the other plots, equal K rates (270 kg K ha −1 ) as KCl were topdressed. Added P did not affect herbage dry mass in the first and second years following stand establishment, but increased herbage P concentration and uptake at Becker. There was no effect of K placement, but the tap‐rooted germplasm had lower K concentration in herbage than the parent. Although progeny did not differ in total root mass, the ratio of thickened‐to‐total root mass was larger below 30 cm for the tap‐rooted selection, which also produced more fine roots. Selected germplasms did not differ in P or K uptake. Selected root system architecture characteristics were expressed under, and apparently not modified by, growing conditions that covered three site‐years on two contrasting soils with differential P supply and K placement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added P did not affect alfalfa herbage dry mass during the first two years after establishment.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Added Pe0
Outcome
herbage dry masse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
first and second years following stand establishmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Added P did not affect herbage dry mass in the first and second years following stand establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added P increased alfalfa herbage P concentration and uptake at Becker.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Added Pe1
Outcome
herbage P concentration and uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Beckere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased herbage P concentration and uptake at Becker.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–972 · show in text ↑
e1

“Added P did not affect herbage dry mass in the first and second years following stand establishment, but increased herbage P concentration and uptake at Becker.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K placement had no reported effect in alfalfa.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
K placemente0
Outcome
effect of K placemente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of K placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap-rooted alfalfa germplasm had lower herbage K concentration than the parent.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
tap‐rooted germplasme0
Outcome
K concentration in herbagee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tap‐rooted germplasm had lower K concentration in herbage than the parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected alfalfa progeny did not differ in total root mass.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
progenye0
Outcome
total root masse0
Direction
did not differe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“progeny did not differ in total root mass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The thickened-to-total root mass ratio below 30 cm was larger in tap-rooted alfalfa selection.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
tap‐rooted selectione0
Outcome
ratio of thickened‐to‐total root masse0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
below 30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratio of thickened‐to‐total root mass was larger below 30 cm for the tap‐rooted selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap-rooted alfalfa selection produced more fine roots.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
tap‐rooted selectione0
Outcome
fine rootse0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tap‐rooted selection, which also produced more fine roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected alfalfa germplasms did not differ in P or K uptake.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Selected germplasmse0
Outcome
P or K uptakee0
Direction
did not differe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selected germplasms did not differ in P or K uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected alfalfa root architecture remained expressed across contrasting soils, P supply and K placement.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
root system architecture characteristicse0
Direction
apparently not modifiede0
Qualifier
three site‐years on two contrasting soils with differential P supply and K placemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selected root system architecture characteristics were expressed under, and apparently not modified by, growing conditions that covered three site‐years on two contrasting soils with differential P supply and K placement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

43 papers: 36 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.