Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate and Application Timing for Chipping Potato Cultivar Atlantic

Lincoln Zotarelli; Libby R. Rens; Daniel J. Cantliffe; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Guidelines for N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) that include application timing and rates are fundamental to minimize yield reduction risks. The study objectives were to determine the effect of N fertilizer rate, applied at the plant emergence and tuber initiation stages, on N use efficiency and yield of cultivar Atlantic chipping potato. Fertilizer rates of 0, 56, 112, 168 kg ha −1 were applied at plant emergence, and 56 and 112 kg ha −1 were applied at tuber initiation as a side‐dress in a factorial randomized complete block design with four replicates in three consecutive years at three commercial farms. All treatments received 56 kg ha −1 of N at pre‐plant. Total N fertilizer applied ranged from 112 to 370 kg ha −1 . Applied N rates influenced the levels of soil inorganic N. The maximum daily N uptake occurred between 55 and 70 d after planting, coinciding with the onset of the tuber bulking stage. Potato yield was similar between N rates applied at emergence with the exception of one farm in 2010 due to high precipitation. Average tuber yield ranged from 15 to 33, 29 to 41, and 33 to 39 Mg ha −1 in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Tuber yield and plant N uptake were similar with N rates above 56 kg ha −1 applied‐at tuber initiation. There was an increased residual concentration of soil N at harvest with higher N application; however, this did not correlate to an increase in potato yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield was similar between N rates applied at emergence, except one farm in 2010

Treatment
N rates applied at emergencee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
with the exception of one farm in 2010 due to high precipitatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potato yield was similar between N rates applied at emergence with the exception of one farm in 2010 due to high precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average potato tuber yield ranged from 15 to 39 Mg/ha across 2010 to 2012 on three commercial farms

Outcome
Average tuber yielde2
Value
15 to 33, 29 to 41, and 33 to 39e2
Setting
three commercial farmse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“Average tuber yield ranged from 15 to 33, 29 to 41, and 33 to 39”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1133 · show in text ↑
e3

“at three commercial farms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber yield and plant N uptake were similar with N rates above 56 kg/ha applied at tuber initiation

Treatment
N rates above 56 kg hae4
Outcome
Tuber yield and plant N uptakee4
Direction
similare4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tuber yield and plant N uptake were similar with N rates above 56 kg ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum daily N uptake by potato occurred 55 to 70 days after planting, at the onset of tuber bulking

Organ / stage
tuber bulking stagee5
Outcome
maximum daily N uptakee5
Value
between 55 and 70 de5
Qualifier
coinciding with the onset of the tuber bulking stagee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum daily N uptake occurred between 55 and 70 d after planting, coinciding with the onset of the tuber bulking stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–939 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N application increased residual soil N at harvest

Treatment
higher N applicatione6
Outcome
residual concentration of soil N at harveste6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was an increased residual concentration of soil N at harvest with higher N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1378 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher residual soil N with higher N application did not correlate with an increase in potato yield

Treatment
higher N applicatione6
Outcome
potato yielde7
Direction
increasee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was an increased residual concentration of soil N at harvest with higher N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1378 · show in text ↑
e7

“this did not correlate to an increase in potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1442 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied N rates influenced soil inorganic N levels

Treatment
Applied N ratese1
Outcome
levels of soil inorganic Ne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer management of potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied N rates influenced the levels of soil inorganic N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–813 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.