Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Effect of N Fertilizer Dosage and Base/Topdressing Ratio on Potato Growth Characteristics and Yield

Xiaoting Fang; Zhuqing Xiang; Haiyan Ma; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen fertilizer is an important kinetic energy for potato production. To study the effect of nitrogen(N) fertilizer application and the topdressing ratio on potato growth and yield, different N application levels: N75 (75 kg ha−1), N150 (150 kg ha−1), N225 (225 kg ha−1) and different N fertilizer base/topdressing ratios: T1 (2:8), T2 (5:5), T3 (8:2), and T4 (10:0) were used to find the best N fertilizer operation. The results showed that higher yields can be obtained when 120–180 kg ha−1 N was applied under the base/topdressing ratio of 8:2 in silt loam (sand–silt–clay: 29-50-21). The base N fertilizer dosage largely determined the root morphology, while topdressing fertilizer mainly affected the leaf photosystem, however, rhizosphere topdressing at the early stages of bud emergence did not immediately affect the leaf soluble protein and the sugar content. Topdressing N increased the tuber crude protein and ascorbic acid content to some extent, but had weak effect on the amylose/amylopectin ratio, for the starch content was mainly influenced by total N application. When base N fertilizer was low, it could be compensated by applying fertilizer during flowering, though when the amount of base fertilizer was sufficient, topdressing would cause a decrease in the average single potato weight and an increase in potato sets per plant, thereby reducing the commercial potato rate. Overall, adopting a suitable base/topdressing ratio can promote plant growth and improve tuber quality and yield. However, the relationship between the specific application amount and the ratio under different soil texture conditions needs further study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield was higher with 120–180 kg ha−1 N and an 8:2 base/topdressing ratio in silt loam.

Treatment
120–180 kg ha−1 Ne0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
120–180 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
base/topdressing ratio of 8:2e0
Setting
silt loame0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that higher yields can be obtained when 120–180 kg ha−1 N was applied under the base/topdressing ratio of 8:2 in silt loam (sand–silt–clay: 29-50-21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

base N fertilizer dosage affected potato root morphology as described.

Treatment
base N fertilizer dosagee0
Outcome
root morphologye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The base N fertilizer dosage largely determined the root morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

topdressing fertilizer affected potato leaf photosystem as described.

Treatment
topdressing fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf photosysteme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing fertilizer mainly affected the leaf photosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rhizosphere topdressing affected potato leaf soluble protein as described.

Treatment
rhizosphere topdressinge0
Outcome
leaf soluble proteine0
Direction
did not immediately affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere topdressing at the early stages of bud emergence did not immediately affect the leaf soluble protein and the sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rhizosphere topdressing affected potato sugar content as described.

Treatment
rhizosphere topdressinge0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
did not immediately affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere topdressing at the early stages of bud emergence did not immediately affect the leaf soluble protein and the sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing N affected potato tuber crude protein as described.

Treatment
Topdressing Ne0
Outcome
tuber crude proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topdressing N increased the tuber crude protein and ascorbic acid content to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing N affected potato ascorbic acid content as described.

Treatment
Topdressing Ne0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topdressing N increased the tuber crude protein and ascorbic acid content to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressing N affected potato amylose/amylopectin ratio as described.

Treatment
Topdressing Ne0
Outcome
amylose/amylopectin ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topdressing N increased the tuber crude protein and ascorbic acid content to some extent, but had weak effect on the amylose/amylopectin ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total N application affected potato starch content as described.

Treatment
total N applicatione0
Outcome
starch contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the starch content was mainly influenced by total N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

topdressing affected potato average single potato weight as described.

Treatment
topdressinge0
Outcome
average single potato weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing would cause a decrease in the average single potato weight and an increase in potato sets per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

topdressing affected potato potato sets per plant as described.

Treatment
topdressinge0
Outcome
potato sets per plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing would cause a decrease in the average single potato weight and an increase in potato sets per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

topdressing affected potato commercial potato rate as described.

Treatment
topdressinge0
Outcome
commercial potato ratee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“topdressing would cause a decrease in the average single potato weight and an increase in potato sets per plant, thereby reducing the commercial potato rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.