Paper · 1985 · New Phytologist

GROWTH AND MINERAL NUTRIENT STATUS IN PEANUT AND SORGHUM IN RESPONSE TO ACID PRECIPITATION AND ALUMINIUM

JAMES D. OWNBY; LYNDON DEES

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary The potential effects of acid rain on the availability of soil nutrients were examined by growing sorghum and peanut seedlings in a loamy sand/perlite mixture such that nutrient availability limited growth. Seedlings were watered with simulated acid precipitation at pH 5.5 (control), 4.5, 3.5, and 2.5 for 28 or 31 d. There was a significant increase in growth rate and plant dry weight for seedlings exposed to subambient (pH 2.5) watering regimes containing both SO 4 2− and NO 3− (6:1, mol/mol). When NO 3− was omitted there was no enhancement of shoot growth, and root growth was approximately 50% of that in the control (pH 55) seedlings. Peanut and sorghum seedlings were also grown in soil amended with AlCl 3 to simulate conditions where acid precipitation depresses soil pH to the Al neutralization range. Under these conditions there was a complete cessation of growth which was attributed primarily to inhibition of uptake and translocation of Ca rather than accumulation of Al in plant tissues. These experiments indicate that input of N but not S from acid precipitation may potentially benefit crop plants and forage grasses growing under low nutrient availability. Al mobilization in acidified soils may affect plant growth through the induction of Ca deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid precipitation at pH 2.5 containing sulfate and nitrate significantly increased seedling growth rate and dry weight.

Taxon
PEANUT AND SORGHUMt0
Treatment
subambient (pH 2.5) watering regimes containing both SO 4 2− and NO 3− (6:1, mol/mol)e0
Outcome
growth rate and plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant increase in growth rate and plant dry weight for seedlings exposed to subambient (pH 2.5) watering regimes containing both SO 4 2− and NO 3− (6:1, mol/mol).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT AND SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting nitrate removed the shoot growth enhancement.

Taxon
PEANUT AND SORGHUMt0
Treatment
NO 3− was omittede0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
no enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When NO 3− was omitted there was no enhancement of shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT AND SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With nitrate omitted, root growth was approximately 50% of control.

Taxon
PEANUT AND SORGHUMt0
Treatment
NO 3− was omittede1
Outcome
root growthe0
Value
approximately 50%e0
Comparator
control (pH 55) seedlingse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“root growth was approximately 50% of that in the control (pH 55) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–652 · show in text ↑
e1

“When NO 3− was omitted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT AND SORGHUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AlCl3 amended soil completely stopped peanut and sorghum seedling growth.

Taxon
Peanut and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghume0
Treatment
soil amended with AlCl 3e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
complete cessatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut and sorghum seedlings were also grown in soil amended with AlCl 3 to simulate conditions where acid precipitation depresses soil pH to the Al neutralization range. Under these conditions there was a complete cessation of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–888 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth cessation under aluminium amendment was attributed primarily to inhibited calcium uptake and translocation.

Taxon
Peanut and sorghumArachis hypogaeaSorghume1
Compound
Cae0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
inhibition of uptake and translocation of Cae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a complete cessation of growth which was attributed primarily to inhibition of uptake and translocation of Ca rather than accumulation of Al in plant tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“Peanut and sorghum seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–682 · show in text ↑

aluminium trichloride · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ph · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ph · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

irrigation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

51 papers: 31 positive, 20 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.