Abstract
A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows: radish, 13.4–19.8% fresh weight and 28.4–36.0% dry weight; carrot, 30.0–97.6% fresh weight and 55.0–150.5% dry weight; lettuce, 58.4% fresh weight and 61.8% dry weight; cotton, 28.7% fiber weight; wheat, 10.6–25.3% weight per grain and 15.4–36.5% grain yield. For the potato crop, although an increase in leaf, shoot, and tuber weight was induced by R. solani 63–70 days after planting, it was not expressed in yield at harvest time.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Radish fresh weight increased 13.4–19.8%.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solanie1symbiont - Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 13.4–19.8%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“radish, 13.4–19.8% fresh weight and 28.4–36.0% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Radish dry weight increased 28.4–36.0%.
- Taxon
- radishRaphanus sativuse0
- Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 28.4–36.0%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“radish, 13.4–19.8% fresh weight and 28.4–36.0% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Carrot fresh weight increased 30.0–97.6%.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotae0 - Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 30.0–97.6%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“carrot, 30.0–97.6% fresh weight and 55.0–150.5% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Carrot dry weight increased 55.0–150.5%.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 55.0–150.5%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“carrot, 30.0–97.6% fresh weight and 55.0–150.5% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Lettuce fresh weight increased 58.4%.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 58.4%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lettuce, 58.4% fresh weight and 61.8% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Lettuce dry weight increased 61.8%.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 61.8%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lettuce, 58.4% fresh weight and 61.8% dry weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton fiber weight increased 28.7%.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- fiber weighte0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 28.7%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cotton, 28.7% fiber weight”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat weight per grain increased 10.6–25.3%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- weight per graine0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 10.6–25.3%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat, 10.6–25.3% weight per grain and 15.4–36.5% grain yield”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield increased 15.4–36.5%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solanie1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 15.4–36.5%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse1
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat, 10.6–25.3% weight per grain and 15.4–36.5% grain yield”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops. In field experiments, it was expressed in increases of plant weight, cotton fiber weight, or grain yield. The increases for treated compared with untreated plants were as follows:”
Claim · model-written summary
Potato leaf, shoot and tuber weights increased 63–70 days after planting.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume0 - Treatment
- R. solanie0
- Interactor
- R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0symbiont
- Outcome
- leaf, shoot, and tuber weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- 63–70 days after plantinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the potato crop, although an increase in leaf, shoot, and tuber weight was induced by R. solani 63–70 days after planting”
e1“A nonpathogenic isolate of Rhizoctonia solani (No. 521, AG-4) induced increased growth in a variety of crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
The potato growth increase was not reflected in yield at harvest.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume1
- Treatment
- R. solanie1
- Interactor
- R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- not expressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it was not expressed in yield at harvest time”
e1“For the potato crop, although an increase in leaf, shoot, and tuber weight was induced by R. solani 63–70 days after planting”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizoctonia solani · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Rhizoctonia solani · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
Rhizoctonia solani · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
Rhizoctonia solani · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.