Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Management of bacteria Pectobacterium carotovorum, Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae, and fungi Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani and Alternaria dauci with silicon dioxide nanoparticles on carrot

Zaki A. Siddiqui; Areesha Hashmi; Manzoor R. Khan; et al.

16
claims
33
verbatim quotes
28
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diseases of carrot (Daucus carota L.) that cause yield losses include bacterial soft-rot incited by Pectobacterium carotovorum pv. carotovorum (Jones) Waldee; bacterial leaf blight incited by Xanthomonas campestris pv. carotae (Pammel) Dowson; fungal leaf blight incited by Alternaria dauci (J.G. Kühn) J.W. Groves & Skolko; rot incited by Fusarium solani (Martius) Sacc., and crown rot incited by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Nanoparticles are used to increase plant growth and provide protection against plant pathogens on various crops, but their effectiveness on carrot is not well understood. Effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) after seed were primed, or applied to foliage, on inhibition of P. carotovorum, X. campestris pv. carotae, A. dauci, F. solani or R. solani, on growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid and proline contents of carrot were determined. Inoculation of plants with all pathogens reduced shoot and root dry weights, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents over uninoculated controls. Inoculation of R. solani caused the greatest reduction (65.18%) in root dry weight and X. campestris pv. carotae the least (20.13%). Seed priming or foliar application with SiO2 NPs increased plant growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated plants, and the uninoculated control. Foliar application was better than seed priming in increasing growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of inoculated plants. The least increase in root dry weight (17.09%) was when plants derived from SiO2 NPs primed seed were inoculated with P. carotovorum, and the most was with foliar-applied SiO2 NPs against R. solani (85.29%). Individual inoculation of plants with pathogens caused increased proline content over the uninoculated control. Proline contents were further increased by the application of SiO2 NPs. Soft rot and bacterial blight index was 3 of 5 when plants were inoculated with P. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. carotae, respectively. Leaf blight/crown rot and root-rot indices were 4 of 5 when inoculation was with A. dauci, F. solani, and R. solani. Application of SiO2 NPs could be useful for the control of bacteria and fungi infecting carrot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation reduced carrot shoot and root dry weights and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Inoculation of plants with all pathogense0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weights, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of plants with all pathogens reduced shoot and root dry weights, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents over uninoculated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani caused the greatest root dry weight reduction, 65.18%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Inoculation of R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
65.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of R. solani caused the greatest reduction (65.18%) in root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X. campestris pv. carotae caused the least root dry weight reduction, 20.13%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
X. campestris pv. carotaee0
Interactor
X. campestris pv. carotaeXanthomonas hortorum pv. carotaee0pathogen
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
leaste0
Value
20.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“X. campestris pv. carotae the least (20.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“in root dry weight and X. campestris pv. carotae the least (20.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming with SiO2 NPs increased growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated and uninoculated carrots.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Seed priminge0
Outcome
plant growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming or foliar application with SiO2 NPs increased plant growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated plants, and the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SiO2 NPs increased growth and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated and uninoculated carrots.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
foliar application with SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
plant growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming or foliar application with SiO2 NPs increased plant growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in inoculated plants, and the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application outperformed seed priming for growth and pigment contents in inoculated carrots.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Foliar applicatione0
Outcome
growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
seed priminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application was better than seed priming in increasing growth, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1443 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NP seed priming gave a 17.09% root dry weight increase with P. carotovorum inoculation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
SiO2 NPs primed seede0
Interactor
P. carotovorumPectobacterium carotovorume0pathogen
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least increase in root dry weight (17.09%) was when plants derived from SiO2 NPs primed seed were inoculated with P. carotovorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SiO2 NPs gave an 85.29% root dry weight increase against R. solani.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
foliar-applied SiO2 NPse0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
85.29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most was with foliar-applied SiO2 NPs against R. solani (85.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1650 · show in text ↑
e1

“The least increase in root dry weight (17.09%) was when plants derived from SiO2 NPs primed seed were inoculated with P. carotovorum, and the most was with foliar-applied SiO2 NPs against R. solani (85.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual pathogen inoculation increased carrot proline content.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Individual inoculation of plants with pathogense0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual inoculation of plants with pathogens caused increased proline content over the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SiO2 NPs further increased carrot proline content.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
application of SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
Proline contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline contents were further increased by the application of SiO2 NPs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. carotovorum inoculation gave a soft rot index of 3 of 5.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
inoculated with P. carotovorume0
Interactor
P. carotovorumPectobacterium carotovorume0pathogen
Outcome
Soft rote0
Value
3 of 5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soft rot and bacterial blight index was 3 of 5 when plants were inoculated with P. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. carotae, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

X. campestris pv. carotae inoculation gave a bacterial blight index of 3 of 5.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
X. campestris pv. carotaee0
Interactor
X. campestris pv. carotaeXanthomonas hortorum pv. carotaee0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial blight indexe0
Value
3 of 5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soft rot and bacterial blight index was 3 of 5 when plants were inoculated with P. carotovorum and X. campestris pv. carotae, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. dauci inoculation gave a leaf blight or crown rot index of 4 of 5.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
inoculation was with A. daucie0
Interactor
A. dauciAlternaria daucie0pathogen
Outcome
Leaf blight/crown rote0
Value
4 of 5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blight/crown rot and root-rot indices were 4 of 5 when inoculation was with A. dauci, F. solani, and R. solani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. solani inoculation gave a root rot index of 4 of 5.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
F. solanie0
Interactor
F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
root-rot indicese0
Value
4 of 5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blight/crown rot and root-rot indices were 4 of 5 when inoculation was with A. dauci, F. solani, and R. solani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani inoculation gave a root rot index of 4 of 5.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
R. solanie0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
root-rot indicese0
Value
4 of 5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf blight/crown rot and root-rot indices were 4 of 5 when inoculation was with A. dauci, F. solani, and R. solani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2092 · show in text ↑
t0

“on carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 189–198 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SiO2 NPs for control of carrot-infecting bacteria and fungi.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Application of SiO2 NPse0
Outcome
control of bacteria and fungi infecting carrote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of SiO2 NPs could be useful for the control of bacteria and fungi infecting carrot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2188 · show in text ↑

Rhizoctonia solani · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Alternaria dauci · disease · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · disease · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 4 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.