Abstract
Effects of Meloidogyne incognita , Alternaria dauci and Fusarium solani were studied on carrot ( Daucus carota L.) growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid and proline contents in different types of soil. Plants grown in 20:80 and 40:60% sand:clay soil mixtures showed a significant increase in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents compared to plants grown in 100% clay soil. However, use of 60:40 sand:clay resulted in a similar root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents as was found in carrots grown in 100% clay soil. Inoculation of plants with M. incognita , A. dauci or F. solani caused a significant reduction in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soil types as compared to their respective control. Inoculation of plants by A. dauci caused the greatest reduction in root dry weight followed by F. solani and M. incognita in different sand and clay mixtures. Use of 20:80, 40:60 or 60:40 sand:clay mixtures caused a significant increase in proline content of plants over those grown in 100% clay soil. Similarly, inoculation of M. incognita , A. dauci and F. solani caused a significant increase in proline content in all soil types compared to their respective control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
The 20:80 sand:clay mixture increased carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents relative to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotat0 - Treatment
- 20:80e0
- Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants grown in 20:80 and 40:60% sand:clay soil mixtures showed a significant increase in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents compared to plants grown in 100% clay soil”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40:60% sand:clay mixture increased carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents relative to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- 40:60% sand:clay soil mixturese0
- Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants grown in 20:80 and 40:60% sand:clay soil mixtures showed a significant increase in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents compared to plants grown in 100% clay soil”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 60:40 sand:clay mixture gave similar carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrotsDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- 60:40 sand:claye0
- Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of 60:40 sand:clay resulted in a similar root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents as was found in carrots grown in 100% clay soil”
Claim · model-written summary
M. incognita inoculation reduced carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of plants with M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita , A. dauci or F. solani caused a significant reduction in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soil types as compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
A. dauci inoculation reduced carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- A. daucie0
- Interactor
- A. dauciAlternaria daucie0pathogen
- Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita , A. dauci or F. solani caused a significant reduction in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soil types as compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
F. solani inoculation reduced carrot root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- F. solanie0
- Interactor
- F. solani
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=60)
Fusarium solanie0pathogen - Outcome
- root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contentse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Sacc._5393379.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita , A. dauci or F. solani caused a significant reduction in root dry weight, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in all soil types as compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
A. dauci caused the greatest carrot root dry weight reduction, followed by F. solani and M. incognita.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- A. daucie0
- Interactor
- A. dauciAlternaria daucie0pathogen
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- greatest reductione0
- Comparator
- F. solani and M. incognitae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants by A. dauci caused the greatest reduction in root dry weight followed by F. solani and M. incognita in different sand and clay mixtures”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 20:80 sand:clay mixture increased carrot proline content relative to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- 20:80e0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of 20:80, 40:60 or 60:40 sand:clay mixtures caused a significant increase in proline content of plants over those grown in 100% clay soil”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 40:60 sand:clay mixture increased carrot proline content relative to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- 40:60e0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of 20:80, 40:60 or 60:40 sand:clay mixtures caused a significant increase in proline content of plants over those grown in 100% clay soil”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 60:40 sand:clay mixture increased carrot proline content relative to clay soil.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- 60:40 sand:clay mixturese0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 100% clay soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of 20:80, 40:60 or 60:40 sand:clay mixtures caused a significant increase in proline content of plants over those grown in 100% clay soil”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
M. incognita inoculation increased carrot proline content in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- inoculation of M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation of M. incognita , A. dauci and F. solani caused a significant increase in proline content in all soil types compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
A. dauci inoculation increased carrot proline content in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- A. daucie0
- Interactor
- A. dauciAlternaria daucie0pathogen
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation of M. incognita , A. dauci and F. solani caused a significant increase in proline content in all soil types compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
Claim · model-written summary
F. solani inoculation increased carrot proline content in all soils.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotat0
- Treatment
- F. solanie0
- Interactor
- F. solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- their respective controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation of M. incognita , A. dauci and F. solani caused a significant increase in proline content in all soil types compared to their respective control”
t0“carrot”
The same questions in other papers
Meloidogyne incognita · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Alternaria dauci · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
inoculation · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.