Paper · 1996 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Influence of rates and methods of manganese application on yield and nutrition of wheat in a reclaimed sodic soil

M. L. Soni; A. Swarup; M. Singh

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India during 1992/93 to evaluate the effects of rates and methods of manganese application on the yield and nutrition of wheat on a reclaimed and intensively cropped Mn-deficient sodic soil (pH = 8·7, exchangeable sodium percentage = 18 and DTPA-extractable Mn = 2·7 mg kg -1 ). There were eight treatments which consisted of a control (no Mn application), three rates of 25, 50 and 100 kg MnSO 4 . H 2 O ha -1 each either as a basal or a top-dressing at first irrigation or a foliar spray of 1·0% MnSO 4 .H 2 O at crown root initiation (CRI), tillering and jointing stages. Grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly with increasing rates of Mn application. A foliar spray of Mn produced a significantly higher yield than 25 and 50 kg MnSO 4 . H 2 O ha -1 applied either as a basal or a top-dressing but similar to that from 100 kg MnSO 4 .H 2 O ha -1 . Efficiency of Mn was higher with a foliar spray (82·6 kg grain kg -1 Mn) than with soil application (4·4–6·4 kg grain kg -1 Mn). Application of Mn increased its concentration in the crop but decreased Fe and Cu crop concentrations. Grain yield had a significant positive correlation with the Mn content of the grain ( r = 0·72) and straw ( r = 0·78). Grain yield was positively correlated with 1000-grain weight ( r = 0·90). Recovery of applied Mn ranged from 28·1 to 33·0%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and straw yield increased significantly with increasing manganese application rates.

Treatment
Mn applicatione0
Outcome
Grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yield of wheat increased significantly with increasing rates of Mn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar manganese produced higher yield than basal application at 25 and 50 kg rates.

Treatment
foliar spray of Mne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
25 and 50 kg MnSO 4 . H 2 O ha -1 applied either as a basal or a top-dressinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A foliar spray of Mn produced a significantly higher yield than 25 and 50 kg MnSO 4 . H 2 O ha -1 applied either as a basal or a top-dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar manganese yield was similar to yield under the 100 kg soil application.

Treatment
foliar spray of Mne1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
similare0
Comparator
100 kg MnSO 4 .H 2 O ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar to that from 100 kg MnSO 4 .H 2 O ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“A foliar spray of Mn produced a significantly higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese efficiency was higher for foliar spray than soil application.

Treatment
foliar spraye0
Outcome
Efficiency of Mne0
Direction
highere0
Value
82·6 kg grain kg -1 Mne0
Qualifier
4·4–6·4 kg grain kg -1 Mne0
Comparator
soil applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficiency of Mn was higher with a foliar spray (82·6 kg grain kg -1 Mn) than with soil application (4·4–6·4 kg grain kg -1 Mn).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese application increased crop manganese concentration.

Treatment
Application of Mne0
Outcome
its concentration in the crope0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Mn increased its concentration in the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese application decreased crop iron concentration.

Treatment
Application of Mne0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Mn increased its concentration in the crop but decreased Fe and Cu crop concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese application decreased crop copper concentration.

Treatment
Application of Mne1
Outcome
Cu crop concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased Fe and Cu crop concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Mn increased its concentration in the crop but decreased Fe and Cu crop concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with grain manganese content.

Organ / stage
graine0
Compound
Mne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0·72e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield had a significant positive correlation with the Mn content of the grain ( r = 0·72)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with straw manganese content.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Compound
Mne0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0·78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield had a significant positive correlation with the Mn content of the grain ( r = 0·72) and straw ( r = 0·78).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively with thousand grain weight.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Value
r = 0·90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was positively correlated with 1000-grain weight ( r = 0·90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recovery of applied manganese ranged from 28.1 to 33.0 percent.

Outcome
Recovery of applied Mne0
Value
28·1 to 33·0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery of applied Mn ranged from 28·1 to 33·0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

manganese atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.