Abstract
Salinity stress is a major and ever-present threat to crop production, especially where irrigation is necessary for agriculture. Two independent field experiments were carried out in natural non-saline (site-I; electrical conductivity [EC] < 4 dS m -1 ) and saline (site-II; EC = 10-13.8 dS m -1 ) fields to test the efficacy of different doses of Si (0, 75, and 150 mg kg -1 ) on two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars with different salt susceptibility, i.e., 'Auqab-2000' (salt-sensitive) and 'SARC-5' (salt-tolerant). The crop was harvested at maturity and various ionic and yield parameters were recorded. The concomitant increase in the number of tillers, number of grains per spike, grain yield, and biological yield were observed given that Si was applied under both optimal and salt-affected field conditions. It was concluded that 'SARC-5' is better than 'Auqab-2000' under salt stress. When Si was applied, similar effects were observed in both cultivars regardless of their salt sensitivity and whether the field was saline or non-saline, and it enhanced wheat growth by improving K + :Na + , which was adversely influenced by salt stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon application increased wheat tiller number under both field salinity conditions.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- number of tillerse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- both optimal and salt-affected field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The concomitant increase in the number of tillers, number of grains per spike, grain yield, and biological yield were observed given that Si was applied under both optimal and salt-affected field conditions”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon application increased wheat grains per spike under both field salinity conditions.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- number of grains per spikee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- both optimal and salt-affected field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The concomitant increase in the number of tillers, number of grains per spike, grain yield, and biological yield were observed given that Si was applied under both optimal and salt-affected field conditions”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon application increased wheat grain yield under both field salinity conditions.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- both optimal and salt-affected field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The concomitant increase in the number of tillers, number of grains per spike, grain yield, and biological yield were observed given that Si was applied under both optimal and salt-affected field conditions”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon application increased wheat biological yield under both field salinity conditions.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- both optimal and salt-affected field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The concomitant increase in the number of tillers, number of grains per spike, grain yield, and biological yield were observed given that Si was applied under both optimal and salt-affected field conditions”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
'SARC-5' performed better than 'Auqab-2000' under salt stress.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Material
- 'SARC-5'e0
- Outcome
- bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- under salt stresse0
- Comparator
- 'Auqab-2000'e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'SARC-5' is better than 'Auqab-2000' under salt stress”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon had similar effects in both cultivars across saline and nonsaline fields.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- Sie0
- Outcome
- similar effectse0
- Qualifier
- regardless of their salt sensitivity and whether the field was saline or non-salinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When Si was applied, similar effects were observed in both cultivars regardless of their salt sensitivity and whether the field was saline or non-saline”
e1“two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon improved wheat growth by improving the K + :Na + ratio.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- salt stresse0
- Outcome
- wheat growthe0
- Qualifier
- improving K + :Na +e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it enhanced wheat growth by improving K + :Na + , which was adversely influenced by salt stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress adversely influenced the K + :Na + ratio in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- salt stresse0
- Outcome
- K + :Na +e0
- Direction
- adversely influencede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“K + :Na + , which was adversely influenced by salt stress”
e1“wheat growth”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.