Paper · 2021 · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Agrobacterium-Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Interactions

Parrott, David L.

15
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes are the causal agents of gall or hairy root disease, but normally the bacteria do not cause disease in wheat. However, both bacteria grew without inhibition when exposed to intact or wounded wheat roots or embryos, and they colonized wheat root surfaces to levels similar to dicotyledonous plants. A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes induced 23% cell death after a 1-h exposure to wheat embryo cells grown in 7.4 mM O2, while the extent of cell death at 2.1 mM 02 was 8%. Contact with A. tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes caused cultured wheat embryo and root cells to rapidly produce H202, which decreased when embryos and roots were cultured at 2.1 mM O2. Browning and autofluorescence, and an increase in ferulic acid in cell walls, were observed in wheat embryo and root epidermal cells exposed to Agrobacterium, but . neither lignin nor callose was detected. Agrobacterium appeared to induce resistance-like responses in wheat that may limit transformation efficiency. The inability to regenerate wheat plants using tissue culture has been a limitation to high efficiency transformation. Regeneration via somatic embryogenesis was improved significantly by simulating the in ovulo environment to which the immature wheat embryos are exposed. Triticum embryo culture medium (TEC) improved callus formation, somatic embryo formation, and regeneration from somatic embryos while reducing precocious germination when compared to growth on Murashige and Skoog medium. Regeneration frequencies were improved when embryos were cultured at the O2 concentration found in the wheat ovule (2.1 mM O2) rather than atmospheric 02concentration (7.4 mM O2). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of wheat was limited by tissue necrosis following co-cultivation, and by poor plant regeneration. Reduction of necrosis and increased plant regeneration were accomplished by amending the culture medium with antioxidant compounds and by reducing the O2 tension in which the wheat embryos were cu1tured. Twelve days past anthesis (DPA), wheat embryos were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains WAg 11 or EHA 101, incubated on TEC medium containing antioxidant compounds (catalase, cysteine and ascorbic acid), and cultured at 2.1 mM O2 concentrations. Transformation was documented in 6.0% ofregeneratedA. tumefaciens WAg 11 exposed wheat plants using the firefly luciferase (luc) reporter system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both bacteria grew without inhibition on exposure to wheat roots or embryos.

Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
grew without inhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both bacteria grew without inhibition when exposed to intact or wounded wheat roots or embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacteria colonized wheat root surfaces to levels similar to dicotyledonous plants.

Outcome
colonized wheat root surfacese0
Comparator
dicotyledonous plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they colonized wheat root surfaces to levels similar to dicotyledonous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrobacterium exposure caused 23% embryo cell death at 7.4 mM O2 versus 8% at 2.1 mM O2.

Treatment
A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenese0
Interactor
A. tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Second interactor
A. rhizogenese0pathogen
Outcome
cell deathe0
Direction
inducede0
Value
23%e0
Qualifier
8%e0
Comparator
2.1 mM 02e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes induced 23% cell death after a 1-h exposure to wheat embryo cells grown in 7.4 mM O2, while the extent of cell death at 2.1 mM 02 was 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contact with either bacterium rapidly induced H202 production in wheat embryo and root cells.

Treatment
Contact with A. tumefaciens or A. rhizogenese0
Interactor
A. tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Second interactor
A. rhizogenese0pathogen
Outcome
produce H202e0
Direction
producee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contact with A. tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes caused cultured wheat embryo and root cells to rapidly produce H202”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H202 production decreased when wheat embryos and roots were cultured at 2.1 mM O2.

Treatment
2.1 mM O2e0
Outcome
H202e1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which decreased when embryos and roots were cultured at 2.1 mM O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat embryo and root cells to rapidly produce H202”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrobacterium exposure produced browning and autofluorescence in wheat embryo and root epidermal cells.

Interactor
AgrobacteriumAgrobacteriume0pathogen
Outcome
Browning and autofluorescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidierFy · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browning and autofluorescence, and an increase in ferulic acid in cell walls, were observed in wheat embryo and root epidermal cells exposed to Agrobacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferulic acid increased in cell walls of Agrobacterium-exposed wheat cells.

Interactor
AgrobacteriumAgrobacteriume0pathogen
Outcome
ferulic acid in cell wallse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidierFy · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in ferulic acid in cell walls, were observed in wheat embryo and root epidermal cells exposed to Agrobacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither lignin nor callose was detected in exposed wheat cells.

Outcome
neither lignin nor callose was detectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither lignin nor callose was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulating the in ovulo environment significantly improved wheat regeneration by somatic embryogenesis.

Treatment
simulating the in ovulo environmente0
Outcome
Regeneration via somatic embryogenesise0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regeneration via somatic embryogenesis was improved significantly by simulating the in ovulo environment to which the immature wheat embryos are exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TEC improved callus and somatic embryo formation and regeneration compared with Murashige and Skoog medium.

Treatment
Triticum embryo culture medium (TEC)e0
Outcome
callus formation, somatic embryo formation, and regeneration from somatic embryose0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
Murashige and Skoog mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum embryo culture medium (TEC) improved callus formation, somatic embryo formation, and regeneration from somatic embryos while reducing precocious germination when compared to growth on Murashige and Skoog medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TEC reduced precocious germination compared with Murashige and Skoog medium.

Treatment
Triticum embryo culture medium (TEC)e0
Outcome
precocious germinatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
Murashige and Skoog mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Triticum embryo culture medium (TEC) improved callus formation, somatic embryo formation, and regeneration from somatic embryos while reducing precocious germination when compared to growth on Murashige and Skoog medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat regeneration frequencies improved at 2.1 mM O2 rather than 7.4 mM O2.

Treatment
2.1 mM O2e0
Outcome
Regeneration frequenciese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
7.4 mM O2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regeneration frequencies were improved when embryos were cultured at the O2 concentration found in the wheat ovule (2.1 mM O2) rather than atmospheric 02concentration (7.4 mM O2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidants and reduced O2 lowered necrosis after Agrobacterium cocultivation.

Treatment
amending the culture medium with antioxidant compounds and by reducing the O2 tensione0
Outcome
necrosise0
Direction
Reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of necrosis and increased plant regeneration were accomplished by amending the culture medium with antioxidant compounds and by reducing the O2 tension in which the wheat embryos were cu1tured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–2022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidants and reduced O2 increased wheat plant regeneration.

Treatment
amending the culture medium with antioxidant compounds and by reducing the O2 tensione0
Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of necrosis and increased plant regeneration were accomplished by amending the culture medium with antioxidant compounds and by reducing the O2 tension in which the wheat embryos were cu1tured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–2022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transformation was documented in 6.0% of regenerated wheat plants exposed to WAg 11.

Interactor
A. tumefaciens WAg 11Agrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Outcome
Transformatione0
Value
6.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transformation was documented in 6.0% ofregeneratedA. tumefaciens WAg 11 exposed wheat plants using the firefly luciferase (luc) reporter system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2431 · show in text ↑

antioxidant · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Triticum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

antioxidant · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

climate site · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

in vitro · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 73 positive, 33 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.