Paper · 1989 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Nodule Formation Is Stimulated by the Ethylene Inhibitor Aminoethoxyvinylglycine

N. Kent Peters; Deborah K. Crist-Estes

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
149
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Previous researchers found that formation and function of nitrogen-fixing nodules on legume roots were severely inhibited by addition of exogenous ethylene. Nodule formation by Rhizobium meliloti on Medicago sativa was stimulated twofold when the ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) was added with the inoculum. Stimulation of nodule formation by AVG showed a similar concentration dependence as inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis, suggesting that the primary action of AVG is the inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis. When AVG was added 2 to 3 days after inoculation, the number of nodules formed was still increased. On a per plant basis, however, the average nitrogen fixation was unchanged by AVG treatment and was independent of nodule number.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding the ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor AVG with the inoculum stimulated nodule formation by Rhizobium meliloti on Medicago sativa twofold.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG)e0
Interactor
Rhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
Nodule formatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
twofolde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodule formation by Rhizobium meliloti on Medicago sativa was stimulated twofold when the ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) was added with the inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stimulation of nodule formation by AVG showed a similar concentration dependence to the inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae7
Treatment
AVGe1
Outcome
nodule formatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Stimulation of nodule formation by AVG showed a similar concentration dependence as inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–457 · show in text ↑
e7

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–214 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that the primary action of AVG is inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae7
Treatment
AVGe2
Outcome
primary action of AVGe2
Qualifier
inhibition of ethylene biosynthesise2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“suggesting that the primary action of AVG is the inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–543 · show in text ↑
e7

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG added 2 to 3 days after inoculation still increased the number of nodules formed.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae7
Treatment
AVG was added 2 to 3 days after inoculatione3
Outcome
number of nodules formede3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“When AVG was added 2 to 3 days after inoculation, the number of nodules formed was still increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–643 · show in text ↑
e7

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per plant, the average nitrogen fixation was unchanged by AVG treatment.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae7
Treatment
AVG treatmente4
Outcome
average nitrogen fixatione4
Direction
unchangede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“On a per plant basis, however, the average nitrogen fixation was unchanged by AVG treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–736 · show in text ↑
e7

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–214 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation per plant was independent of nodule number.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae7
Organ / stage
nodulee5
Outcome
nitrogen fixatione4e5
Direction
independente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“On a per plant basis, however, the average nitrogen fixation was unchanged by AVG treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–736 · show in text ↑
e5

“was independent of nodule number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–773 · show in text ↑
e7

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–214 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.