Paper · 1972 · Physiologia Plantarum

Growth of Peach Plants under Different Filtered Sunlight Conditions

AMNON EREZ; AVISHAG KADMAN-ZAHAVI

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Young peach plants (Prunus persica) were grown outdoors under different colored filters, to examine the effect of light quality on plant behavior. It was found that under blue light growth rate, leaf size and number, rate of spring bud opening and secondary branching were very similar to control plants grown under neutral shade. Blue + far-red light showed an overall strong inhibitory effect on all these characteristics. Red + far-red light produced the strongest growth activity with best results in growth rate and leaf size and number. The phytochrome pigment system was suggested to be the only pigment regulating growth under high light intensities. Blue and blue + far-red light acted antagonistically on apical dominance features of the tree. The former produced a wider tree with nearly horizontal shoots, while the latter produced a more erect narrow tree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under blue light growth, leaf traits, bud opening and branching resembled neutral shade controls.

Taxon
peach plantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
growth rate, leaf size and number, rate of spring bud opening and secondary branchinge0
Direction
very similare0
Comparator
control plants grown under neutral shadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under blue light growth rate, leaf size and number, rate of spring bud opening and secondary branching were very similar to control plants grown under neutral shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–330 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach plants”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue plus far-red light strongly inhibited those growth and developmental traits.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Blue + far-red lighte0
Outcome
all these characteristicse0
Direction
strong inhibitory effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blue + far-red light showed an overall strong inhibitory effect on all these characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus far-red light produced the strongest growth rate and leaf size and number.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Red + far-red lighte0
Outcome
growth rate and leaf size and numbere0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red + far-red light produced the strongest growth activity with best results in growth rate and leaf size and number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest phytochrome alone regulates growth under high light intensities.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
phytochrome pigment systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phytochrome pigment system was suggested to be the only pigment regulating growth under high light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light produced wider trees with nearly horizontal shoots.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Bluee1
Outcome
a wider tree with nearly horizontal shootse0
Comparator
blue + far-red lighte1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The former produced a wider tree with nearly horizontal shoots, while the latter produced a more erect narrow tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blue and blue + far-red light acted antagonistically on apical dominance features of the tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue plus far-red light produced a more erect, narrow tree.

Taxon
Peach PlantsPrunus persicat0
Treatment
blue + far-red lighte1
Outcome
a more erect narrow treee0
Comparator
Bluee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The former produced a wider tree with nearly horizontal shoots, while the latter produced a more erect narrow tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blue and blue + far-red light acted antagonistically on apical dominance features of the tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.