Paper · 2008 · Agronomy Journal

Long‐Term Agronomic Performance of Organic and Conventional Field Crops in the Mid‐Atlantic Region

Michel A. Cavigelli; John R. Teasdale; Anne E. Conklin

15
claims
18
verbatim quotes
184
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in organic grain crop production, there is inadequate information regarding the performance of organically‐produced grain crops in the United States, especially in Coastal Plain soils of the mid‐Atlantic region. We report on corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yields at the USDA‐ARS Beltsville Farming Systems Project (FSP), a long‐term cropping systems trial established in Maryland in 1996 to evaluate the sustainability of organic and conventional grain crop production. The five FSP cropping systems include a conventional no‐till corn–soybean–wheat/soybean rotation (NT), a conventional chisel‐till corn–soybean–wheat/soybean rotation (CT), a 2‐yr organic corn–soybean rotation (Org2), a 3‐yr organic corn–soybean–wheat rotation (Org3), and a 4‐ to 6‐yr organic corn–soybean–wheat–hay rotation (Org4+). Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT. Low N availability explained, on average, 73% of yield losses in organic systems relative to CT while weed competition and plant population explained, on average, 23 and 4%, respectively, of these yield losses. The positive relationship between crop rotation length and corn yield among organic systems was related to increasing N availability and decreasing weed abundance with increasing rotation length. Soybean yield averaged 19% lower in the three organic systems (2.88 Mg ha −1 ) than in the conventional systems (3.57 Mg ha −1 ) and weed competition alone accounted for this difference. There were no consistent differences in wheat yield among cropping systems. Crop rotation length and complexity had little impact on soybean and wheat yields among organic systems. Results indicate that supplying adequate N for corn and controlling weeds in both corn and soybean are the biggest challenges to achieving equivalent yields between organic and conventional cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield over 9 years was similar under conventional no-till and chisel-till (about 7.9 and 8.0 Mg/ha).

Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
corn grain yielde1
Direction
similare1
Value
7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield in the 2-yr organic corn–soybean rotation (Org2) was 41% lower than in CT.

Treatment
Org2e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lesse1
Value
41e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield in the 3-yr organic rotation (Org3) was 31% lower than in CT.

Treatment
Org3e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lesse1
Value
31e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield in the 4- to 6-yr organic rotation (Org4+) was 24% lower than in CT.

Treatment
Org4+e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lesse1
Value
24%e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N availability explained about 73% of corn yield losses in organic systems relative to CT.

Treatment
Low N availabilitye2
Outcome
yield lossese2
Value
73%e2
Comparator
CTe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low N availability explained, on average, 73% of yield losses in organic systems relative to CT while weed competition and plant population explained, on average, 23 and 4%, respectively, of these yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition explained about 23% of corn yield losses in organic systems.

Treatment
weed competitione2
Outcome
yield lossese2
Value
23e2
Comparator
CTe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low N availability explained, on average, 73% of yield losses in organic systems relative to CT while weed competition and plant population explained, on average, 23 and 4%, respectively, of these yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population explained about 4% of corn yield losses in organic systems.

Treatment
plant populatione2
Outcome
yield lossese2
Value
4%e2
Comparator
CTe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Average corn grain yield during 9 yr was similar in NT and CT (7.88 and 8.03 Mg ha −1 , respectively) but yields in Org2, Org3, and Org4+ were, respectively, 41, 31, and 24% less than in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1080 · show in text ↑
e2

“Low N availability explained, on average, 73% of yield losses in organic systems relative to CT while weed competition and plant population explained, on average, 23 and 4%, respectively, of these yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield had a positive relationship with crop rotation length among organic systems.

Treatment
crop rotation lengthe3
Outcome
corn yielde3
Direction
positivee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The positive relationship between crop rotation length and corn yield among organic systems was related to increasing N availability and decreasing weed abundance with increasing rotation length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1487 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rotation effect on corn yield was related to increasing N availability and decreasing weed abundance (author interpretation).

Outcome
corn yielde3
Qualifier
increasing N availability and decreasing weed abundancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The positive relationship between crop rotation length and corn yield among organic systems was related to increasing N availability and decreasing weed abundance with increasing rotation length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was 19% lower in the three organic systems than in conventional systems.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
three organic systemse4
Outcome
Soybean yielde4
Direction
lowere4
Value
19%e4
Qualifier
2.88 Mg ha −1e4
Comparator
conventional systemse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Soybean yield averaged 19% lower in the three organic systems (2.88 Mg ha −1 ) than in the conventional systems (3.57 Mg ha −1 ) and weed competition alone accounted for this difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1674 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition alone accounted for the soybean yield difference between organic and conventional systems.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
weed competitione4
Outcome
Soybean yielde4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Soybean yield averaged 19% lower in the three organic systems (2.88 Mg ha −1 ) than in the conventional systems (3.57 Mg ha −1 ) and weed competition alone accounted for this difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1674 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield showed no consistent differences among cropping systems.

Treatment
cropping systemse5
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
no consistent differencese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“There were no consistent differences in wheat yield among cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1750 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation length and complexity had little impact on soybean yield among organic systems.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
Crop rotation length and complexitye6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
little impacte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Crop rotation length and complexity had little impact on soybean and wheat yields among organic systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1855 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation length and complexity had little impact on wheat yield among organic systems.

Treatment
Crop rotation length and complexitye6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
little impacte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Crop rotation length and complexity had little impact on soybean and wheat yields among organic systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1855 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate N supply for corn and weed control in corn and soybean are the main challenges to equivalent organic and conventional yields (author recommendation).

Outcome
supplying adequate N for corn and controlling weeds in both corn and soybeane7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Results indicate that supplying adequate N for corn and controlling weeds in both corn and soybean are the biggest challenges to achieving equivalent yields between organic and conventional cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2063 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    In 1994, yield was greater after soybean, 11.4 versus 10.7 Mg ha −1.

    Corn Growth and Yield under Different Crop Rotation, Tillage, and Management Systems · 1998 · compared with corn under high chemical management

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 254 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.