Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the fourth year, organic corn yield in the longest rotation (8.1 Mg ha −1) was greater than conventional corn yield (7.1 Mg ha −1).

A claim from Agroecosystem Performance during Transition to Certified Organic Grain Production · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the fourth year, organic corn yield in the longest rotation (8.1 Mg ha −1) was greater than conventional corn yield (7.1 Mg ha −1).

Treatment
longest rotatione2
Outcome
organic corn yielde2
Direction
greatere2
Value
8.1 Mg ha −1e2
Qualifier
7.1 Mg ha −1e2
Comparator
conventional corn yielde2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in the fourth year, the organic corn yield of 8.1 Mg ha −1 in the longest rotation was greater than the conventional corn yield of 7.1 Mg ha −1 in the conventional corn–soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1021

Title

Agroecosystem Performance during Transition to Certified Organic Grain Production

Kathleen Delate; Cynthia A. Cambardella Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.1288

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-6e8f659c5d481bbd637f8b14cd606bb976b37216a7aa5b5369ac86299e37fec4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

313 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.