Paper · 2013 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Efficiency of screening criteria for drought tolerance in chickpea

Masoumeh Pouresmael; Ramazan Ali Khavari-Nejad; Javad Mozafari; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop drought tolerance improvement is one of the most challenging objectives of plant breeding programs. Developing an efficient screening technology and access to genetic variation for the traits contributing toward drought tolerance are major steps in this direction. To go in this quest, an experiment was conducted under controlled condition in a greenhouse. Nine Kabuli chickpea genotypes were grown under well-watered condition (85–90% field capacity (FC)) until start of flowering. Then, the following water treatments were imposed: well-watered, intermediate (55–60% FC), and severe (25–30% FC) drought stress. Physiological and agronomical traits were compared under different water treatments. Drought stress and genotypes interaction was significant in all measured traits, indicating that various genotypes responded differently to drought stress. Among measured traits, electrolyte leakage, stomatal conductance, yield components, and harvest index exhibited the highest variations. Yield components and stomatal conductance showed maximum reduction under drought stress and in susceptible known genotype, ILC3279, reduction reached up to 95%. Principal component analysis indicated that relative water content, photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, and stomatal conductance are the physiological traits with greater contribution toward drought tolerance. Therefore, these traits should be evaluated ahead of many other traits in making selections for drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought treatment interacted significantly with chickpea genotype for all measured traits.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
all measured traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress and genotypes interaction was significant in all measured traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrolyte leakage, stomatal conductance, yield components and harvest index had the highest variation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage, stomatal conductance, yield components, and harvest indexe0
Direction
highest variationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electrolyte leakage, stomatal conductance, yield components, and harvest index exhibited the highest variations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components showed maximum reduction under drought stress, reaching up to 95% in ILC3279.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC3279e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Yield componentse0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Value
95%e0
Comparator
well-waterede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield components and stomatal conductance showed maximum reduction under drought stress and in susceptible known genotype, ILC3279, reduction reached up to 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“well-watered condition (85–90% field capacity (FC))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance showed maximum reduction under drought stress, reaching up to 95% in ILC3279.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC3279e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Value
95%e0
Comparator
well-waterede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield components and stomatal conductance showed maximum reduction under drought stress and in susceptible known genotype, ILC3279, reduction reached up to 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“well-watered condition (85–90% field capacity (FC))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–462 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal components identified relative water content, PSII photochemical efficiency and stomatal conductance as leading drought tolerance contributors.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
chickpeat0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
greater contributione0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, and stomatal conductance are the physiological traits with greater contribution toward drought tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating those physiological traits when selecting drought tolerant chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
evaluated ahead of many other traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these traits should be evaluated ahead of many other traits in making selections for drought-tolerant chickpea genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1507 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.