Paper · 2007 · Ozone Science and Engineering

Comparison of Aqueous Ozone and Chlorine as Sanitizers in the Food Processing Industry: Impact on Fresh Agricultural Produce Quality

Kuangji Wei; Hongde Zhou; Ting Zhou; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
63
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of ozone treatment on fresh strawberry and shredded lettuce food quality were tested by varying applied ozone concentration, contact time, pH and temperature to assess ozone a potential food sanitizer. The produce quality was assessed by comparing the changes in texture firmness, browning and decolorization, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide respiration after the post-treatment storage from 0 to 21 days. The effectiveness of ozonation on natural microfloras including mesophiles, psychotrophes, yeasts and molds, was also evaluated for the improvement in produce shelf-life. As compared to chlorine treatments, ozone treatments slightly increased the lettuce browning but substantially retarded its respiration rates and firmness deterioration even after 21 days of storage. For strawberry, no significant difference in food quality was observed between ozone and chlorine treatments. Finally, ozone treatments at the doses below 10 mg/L were found not effective in killing natural microfloras grown on the produce surfaces.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone slightly increased lettuce browning relative to chlorine.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
ozone treatmentse0
Outcome
lettuce browninge0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chlorine treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to chlorine treatments, ozone treatments slightly increased the lettuce browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fresh Agricultural Produce Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone substantially slowed lettuce respiration relative to chlorine.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
ozone treatmentse0
Outcome
respiration ratese0
Direction
retardede0
Qualifier
even after 21 days of storagee0
Comparator
chlorine treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to chlorine treatments, ozone treatments slightly increased the lettuce browning but substantially retarded its respiration rates and firmness deterioration even after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fresh Agricultural Produce Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone substantially slowed lettuce firmness deterioration relative to chlorine.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
ozone treatmentse0
Outcome
firmness deterioratione0
Direction
retardede0
Comparator
chlorine treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to chlorine treatments, ozone treatments slightly increased the lettuce browning but substantially retarded its respiration rates and firmness deterioration even after 21 days of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fresh Agricultural Produce Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry quality did not significantly differ between ozone and chlorine treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
ozonee0
Outcome
food qualitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
chlorine treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For strawberry, no significant difference in food quality was observed between ozone and chlorine treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone below 10 mg/L was ineffective against natural microflora on produce.

Taxon
fresh strawberry and shredded lettucee1
Treatment
ozone treatments at the doses below 10 mg/Le0
Outcome
natural microfloras grown on the produce surfacese0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ozone treatments at the doses below 10 mg/L were found not effective in killing natural microfloras grown on the produce surfaces.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“fresh strawberry and shredded lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–71 · show in text ↑

ozone · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

ozone · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ozone · quality: general · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.