Paper · 1999 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Heavy Metal Resistance and Accumulation Characteristics in Willows

Tracy Punshon; Nicholas Dickinson

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
61
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The resistance of Salix to Cu, Cd, Ni, and Zn was investigated in hydroponic culture, with phytoextraction potential evaluated for Cu. Root elongation (indicative of resistance level) was significantly affected, with considerable variation between and within individual clones. Resistance appeared to be clone- or hybrid-specific, rather than species-specific. S. caprea clones (and hybrids) were among the most resistant, but a secondary S. caprea clone from a different provenance was much less tolerant. S. viminalis and S. triandra clones were the most sensitive. Highest resistance was found in response to Cd, while Cu and Ni were extremely toxic. A resistant S. caprea ecotype originating from a metalliferous mine spoil was identified using this technique. Copper concentration reached a maximum of 2000, 400, and 82 μg g-1 (d.wt) in roots, wood, and foliage, respectively, after 1 month in hydroponic culture. The level of variation in the response of Salix to metals may cause difficulties in phytoremediation screening programs, but may be essential in providing genetic variation for selection of metal resistance traits, where the contaminant profile is heterogeneous, mixed, or subject to change. Clone selection for metal phytoextraction is feasible, but a longer field-scale study on metal-contaminated soils is needed before their role in phytoremediation can be confirmed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root elongation of Salix was significantly affected by metals and varied between and within clones.

Taxon
SalixSalixe0
Treatment
Cu, Cd, Ni, and Zne0
Outcome
Root elongatione0
Setting
hydroponic culturee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resistance of Salix to Cu, Cd, Ni, and Zn was investigated in hydroponic culture, with phytoextraction potential evaluated for Cu. Root elongation (indicative of resistance level) was significantly affected, with considerable variation between and within individual clones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–286 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Willow resistance appeared clone or hybrid specific rather than species specific.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Outcome
Resistancee0
Qualifier
clone- or hybrid-specific, rather than species-specifice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance appeared to be clone- or hybrid-specific, rather than species-specific.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. caprea clones and hybrids were among the most resistant.

Taxon
S. capreaSalix capreae0
Material
clones (and hybrids)e0
Outcome
most resistante0
Direction
most resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix caprea
Salix caprea · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. caprea clones (and hybrids) were among the most resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second S. caprea clone from another provenance was much less tolerant.

Taxon
S. capreaSalix capreae0
Material
a secondary S. caprea clonee0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix caprea
Salix caprea · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a secondary S. caprea clone from a different provenance was much less tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. viminalis clones were among the most sensitive.

Taxon
S. viminalisSalix viminalise0
Material
clonese0
Outcome
most sensitivee0
Direction
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix viminalis
Salix viminalis · TaxonJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. viminalis and S. triandra clones were the most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. triandra clones were among the most sensitive.

Taxon
S. triandraSalix triandrae0
Material
clonese0
Outcome
most sensitivee0
Direction
most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix triandra
Salix triandra · TaxonBCB · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. viminalis and S. triandra clones were the most sensitive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salix had highest resistance to Cd.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest resistance was found in response to Cd, while Cu and Ni were extremely toxic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu and Ni were extremely toxic to Salix.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Treatment
Cu and Nie0
Outcome
extremely toxice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest resistance was found in response to Cd, while Cu and Ni were extremely toxic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The technique identified a resistant S. caprea ecotype from mine spoil.

Taxon
S. capreaSalix capreae0
Material
ecotypee0
Outcome
resistante0
Value
resistante0
Setting
metalliferous mine spoile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix caprea
Salix caprea · TaxonKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A resistant S. caprea ecotype originating from a metalliferous mine spoil was identified using this technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper concentration reached 2000 μg g-1 (d.wt) in roots after one month of hydroponic culture.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Copper concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2000e0
Qualifier
after 1 month in hydroponic culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper concentration reached a maximum of 2000, 400, and 82 μg g-1 (d.wt) in roots, wood, and foliage, respectively, after 1 month in hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper concentration reached 400 μg g-1 (d.wt) in wood after one month.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Organ / stage
woode0
Outcome
Copper concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
400e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper concentration reached a maximum of 2000, 400, and 82 μg g-1 (d.wt) in roots, wood, and foliage, respectively, after 1 month in hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper concentration reached 82 μg g-1 (d.wt) in foliage after one month.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
Copper concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
82 μg g-1 (d.wt)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper concentration reached a maximum of 2000, 400, and 82 μg g-1 (d.wt) in roots, wood, and foliage, respectively, after 1 month in hydroponic culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Variation among Salix clones may hinder screening but can supply variation for resistance selection.

Taxon
SalixSalixe0
Outcome
variation in the response of Salix to metalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level of variation in the response of Salix to metals may cause difficulties in phytoremediation screening programs, but may be essential in providing genetic variation for selection of metal resistance traits, where the contaminant profile is heterogeneous, mixed, or subject to change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1219 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clone selection for metal phytoextraction is feasible, but longer field study is needed.

Taxon
WillowsSalixt0
Outcome
a longer field-scale study on metal-contaminated soils is needede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clone selection for metal phytoextraction is feasible, but a longer field-scale study on metal-contaminated soils is needed before their role in phytoremediation can be confirmed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Willows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑