Paper · 1979 · Crop Science

Effect of Nitrogen Supply on Photosynthate Partitioning, Root Carbohydrate Accumulation, and Acetylene Reduction in Birdsfoot Trefoil1

A. L. Barta

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Birdsfoot trefoil ( Lotus corniculatus L.) has both low rates of N 2 fixation and low levels of root total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) during midsummer regrowth. These observations suggest that reduced assimilate transport to roots may limit N 2 fixation and consequently total plant growth. The objective of this study was to determine how rate of growth, as influenced by N supply, affected the distribution and accumulation of photosynthate during regrowth of trefoil. Nutrient solution supplied to well‐nodulated plants grown in sand was either 0 or 1 mM N (NH 4 NO 3 ). Two and 4 weeks after cutting and the start of N treatments, plants were harvested and analyzed. Supplemental N caused a sharp decrease in acetylene reduction rate and a two‐fold increase in shoot dry weight 4 weeks after cutting. However, neither root dry weight nor TNC were significantly affected by supplemental N. Distribution of 14 C showed reduced amounts of photosynthate accumulated in N supplemented roots at both 2 and 4 weeks after cutting. These data suggest that shoot growth of trefoil is a dominant sink for photosynthate and that photosynthate accumulation is not readily altered by N source or amount supplied. Numerous significant differences in distribution of 14 C among classes of metabolites were evident only at the 2‐week harvest. More rapid metabolism of labeled sugars into other growth intermediates in N‐supplemented plants at this stage indicates that available soil N may be very important for rapid regrowth after cutting. Four weeks after cutting, when N 2 fixation rates had increased several fold, distribution of 14 C among various metabolites was not influenced by N source indicating little effect of N source on rate of assimilate metabolism in the plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental nitrogen sharply decreased acetylene reduction rate four weeks after cutting.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
Supplemental Ne0
Outcome
acetylene reduction ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
4 weeks after cuttinge0
Comparator
0e1

Verbatim

e0

“Supplemental N caused a sharp decrease in acetylene reduction rate and a two‐fold increase in shoot dry weight 4 weeks after cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental nitrogen doubled shoot dry weight four weeks after cutting.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
Supplemental Ne0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
two‐folde0
Qualifier
4 weeks after cuttinge0
Comparator
0e1

Verbatim

e0

“Supplemental N caused a sharp decrease in acetylene reduction rate and a two‐fold increase in shoot dry weight 4 weeks after cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental nitrogen did not significantly affect root dry weight.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
supplemental Ne0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Comparator
0e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“neither root dry weight nor TNC were significantly affected by supplemental N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental nitrogen did not significantly affect root total nonstructural carbohydrate.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
supplemental Ne0
Outcome
TNCe0
Comparator
0e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“neither root dry weight nor TNC were significantly affected by supplemental N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–898 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen-supplemented roots accumulated less photosynthate at both two and four weeks after cutting.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
N supplementede0
Outcome
amounts of photosynthate accumulated in N supplemented rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both 2 and 4 weeks after cuttinge0
Comparator
0e1

Verbatim

e0

“Distribution of 14 C showed reduced amounts of photosynthate accumulated in N supplemented roots at both 2 and 4 weeks after cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot growth was interpreted as the dominant photosynthate sink.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Outcome
dominant sink for photosynthatee0

Verbatim

e0

“shoot growth of trefoil is a dominant sink for photosynthate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthate accumulation was interpreted as resistant to changes in nitrogen source or supply.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
N source or amount suppliede0
Outcome
photosynthate accumulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthate accumulation is not readily altered by N source or amount supplied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolite classes differed significantly in radiolabel distribution only at the two-week harvest.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Outcome
distribution of 14 C among classes of metabolitese0
Direction
differencese0
Qualifier
2‐week harveste0

Verbatim

e0

“Numerous significant differences in distribution of 14 C among classes of metabolites were evident only at the 2‐week harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At two weeks, labeled sugars were metabolized more rapidly into growth intermediates in nitrogen-supplemented plants.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
N‐supplementede0
Outcome
metabolism of labeled sugars into other growth intermediatese0
Direction
More rapide0
Qualifier
this stagee0
Comparator
0e1

Verbatim

e0

“More rapid metabolism of labeled sugars into other growth intermediates in N‐supplemented plants at this stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1446 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil nitrogen was interpreted as potentially important for rapid regrowth after cutting.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Outcome
rapid regrowth after cuttinge0
Qualifier
available soil Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“available soil N may be very important for rapid regrowth after cutting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation rates had increased severalfold by four weeks after cutting.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Outcome
N 2 fixation ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
several folde0
Qualifier
Four weeks after cuttinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Four weeks after cutting, when N 2 fixation rates had increased several fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source did not influence radiolabel distribution among metabolites at four weeks.

Taxon
Birdsfoot Trefoilt0
Treatment
N sourcee0
Outcome
distribution of 14 C among various metabolitese0
Comparator
0e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“distribution of 14 C among various metabolites was not influenced by N source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“either 0 or 1 mM N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Birdsfoot Trefoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑