Paper · 1998 · Grass and Forage Science

The efficacy of repeated applications of the urease inhibitorN‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide for improving the efficiency of urea fertilizer utilization on temperate grassland

C. J. Watson; P. Poland; M. B. D. Allen

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of N ‐( n ‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT)‐amended urea on herbage dry‐matter yield and nitrogen offtake by perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne ) was studied in fifteen grassland experiments at two sites in Northern Ireland between 1994 and 1996. The dry‐matter yield and N offtake with applied urea was only significantly lower than that with applied calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) on four occasions. On these occasions nBTPT increased the yield from the application of urea making it almost as effective as CAN. There was no evidence of any adverse effect on grass production with repeated applications of nBTPT‐amended urea over a 3‐year period and no indication that its efficacy to reduce NH 3 , loss from ureatreated swards declined when used repeatedly on the same soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea gave significantly lower dry matter yield than calcium ammonium nitrate on four occasions.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
applied ureae0
Outcome
dry‐matter yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
on four occasionse0
Comparator
applied calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry‐matter yield and N offtake with applied urea was only significantly lower than that with applied calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) on four occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea gave significantly lower nitrogen offtake than calcium ammonium nitrate on four occasions.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
applied ureae0
Outcome
N offtakee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
on four occasionse0
Comparator
applied calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry‐matter yield and N offtake with applied urea was only significantly lower than that with applied calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) on four occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nBTPT increased yield from urea to nearly the calcium ammonium nitrate level on those occasions.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
nBTPTe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CANe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On these occasions nBTPT increased the yield from the application of urea making it almost as effective as CAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated nBTPT-amended urea showed no adverse grass production effect over three years.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
repeated applications of nBTPT‐amended ureae0
Outcome
grass productione0
Direction
no evidence of any adverse effecte0
Qualifier
over a 3‐year periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence of any adverse effect on grass production with repeated applications of nBTPT‐amended urea over a 3‐year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–674 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–172 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated use on the same soil showed no decline in efficacy against ammonia loss.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Outcome
efficacy to reduce NH 3 , loss from ureatreated swardse0
Direction
no indication that its efficacy to reduce NH 3 , loss from ureatreated swards declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no indication that its efficacy to reduce NH 3 , loss from ureatreated swards declined when used repeatedly on the same soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–172 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Results differ

59 papers: 44 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.