Paper · 1968 · Journal of Dairy Science

Normal and Late Harvesting of Corn for Silage

C.H. Gordon; J.C. Derbyshire; P.J. Van Soest

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Corn silage was harvested in two successive years at the hard dough stage (normal) and seven to eight weeks later after full maturity and additional weathering (late). Dr)" matter yield was 19 to 27% less when harvested late. Dry matter content of the normal crops at harvest was 26 and 30%; that of late harvested crops was 58 and 63%. Average dry matter recovery rate was slightly lower in the normal silage, 92 vs. 96, and no differences in feeding value were detected when fed in a mixed ration for milking cows. Small reductions in the digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber in late silage were noted in one year (60 vs. 63%), as was a tendency to heat when fed in hot weather. Normal silage contained more acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acid than late silage (2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%, respectively). The results indicated that production of high quality silage from late harvesting is quite possible under good storage conditions, but the practice would usually be impractical because of high field losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late harvest reduced corn dry matter yield by 19 to 27%.

Treatment
harvested latee0
Outcome
Dr)" matter yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
19 to 27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dr)" matter yield was 19 to 27% less when harvested late”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late harvested crops had higher dry matter content than normal crops.

Treatment
late harvestede0
Outcome
Dry matter contente0
Value
58 and 63%e0
Qualifier
26 and 30%e0
Comparator
normal cropse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry matter content of the normal crops at harvest was 26 and 30%; that of late harvested crops was 58 and 63%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal silage had slightly lower dry matter recovery than late silage.

Treatment
normal silagee0
Outcome
dry matter recovery ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
92 vs. 96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average dry matter recovery rate was slightly lower in the normal silage, 92 vs. 96”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding value did not differ when silage was fed in a mixed ration for milking cows.

Outcome
feeding valuee0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“no differences in feeding value were detected when fed in a mixed ration for milking cows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late silage had slightly reduced dry matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility in one year.

Treatment
late silagee0
Outcome
digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fibere0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
60 vs. 63%e0
Qualifier
in one yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Small reductions in the digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber in late silage were noted in one year (60 vs. 63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late silage tended to heat when fed in hot weather.

Outcome
tendency to heate0
Qualifier
when fed in hot weathere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“a tendency to heat when fed in hot weather”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal silage had more acetic, propionic, butyric and lactic acid than late silage.

Treatment
Normal silagee0
Outcome
acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acide0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%e0
Comparator
late silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Normal silage contained more acetic, propionic, butyric, and lactic acid than late silage (2.8, 0.2, 0.2, and 7.8 vs. 1.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 3.7%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–853 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High quality silage from late harvest was considered possible under good storage, but usually impractical due to field losses.

Outcome
the practice would usually be impracticale0
Qualifier
under good storage conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“production of high quality silage from late harvesting is quite possible under good storage conditions, but the practice would usually be impractical because of high field losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1060 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 27 positive, 13 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 40 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.