Paper · 1971 · New Phytologist

PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY OF INTACT YOUNG WHEAT ROOTS UNDER STERILE AND NONSTERILE CONDITIONS

E. H. RIDGE; A. D. ROVIRA

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
89
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary In assays of acid phosphatase activity with p‐nitrophenyl phosphate as substrate, the low activity found in fluids removed from around roots in liquid medium was not affected by the presence of micro‐organisms. Most phosphatase activity of intact seedling roots was associated with the root surface and was not increased by micro‐organisms in the rhizoplane; in some experiments activity was significantly reduced by soil micro‐organisms. Inoculation of roots with pure cultures of bacteria and a fungus known to have phosphatase activity did not increase this activity of the roots. These results are contrasted with those of other workers. Possible application to the soil situation is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microorganisms did not affect the low acid phosphatase activity in fluids around wheat roots.

Treatment
presence of micro‐organismse0
Interactor
micro‐organismse0other
Outcome
activity found in fluids removed from around rootse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the low activity found in fluids removed from around roots in liquid medium was not affected by the presence of micro‐organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–218 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most intact wheat seedling-root phosphatase activity was associated with the root surface.

Organ / stage
root surfacee0
Outcome
phosphatase activity of intact seedling rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most phosphatase activity of intact seedling roots was associated with the root surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–307 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoplane microorganisms did not increase wheat-root phosphatase activity.

Treatment
micro‐organisms in the rhizoplanee0
Interactor
micro‐organismse0other
Outcome
phosphatase activitye1
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not increased by micro‐organisms in the rhizoplane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most phosphatase activity of intact seedling roots was associated with the root surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microorganisms significantly reduced wheat-root phosphatase activity in some experiments.

Treatment
soil micro‐organismse0
Interactor
soil micro‐organismse0other
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in some experiments activity was significantly reduced by soil micro‐organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with phosphatase-active bacteria did not increase wheat-root phosphatase activity.

Treatment
Inoculation of roots with pure cultures of bacteriae0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0other
Outcome
phosphatase activitye1
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of roots with pure cultures of bacteria and a fungus known to have phosphatase activity did not increase this activity of the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphatase activity of intact seedling roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with a phosphatase-active fungus did not increase wheat-root phosphatase activity.

Treatment
Inoculation of roots with pure cultures of bacteria and a funguse0
Interactor
a funguse0other
Outcome
phosphatase activitye1
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of roots with pure cultures of bacteria and a fungus known to have phosphatase activity did not increase this activity of the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT ROOTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphatase activity of intact seedling roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–270 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bacteria · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.