Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Water Deficit at Different Growth Phases of Peanut. II. Response to Drought During Preflowering Phase

R. C. Nageswara Rao; J. H. Williams; M. V. K. Sivakumar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
69
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Water deficits can affect peanut yields differentially depending on time of occurrence and intensity. Previous reports have shown that moderate water deficit during the preflowering phase increases pod yields by 13 to 19% relative to the fully irrigated control. This paper describes, in a more quantitative way, crop physiological factors that contribute to these increased yields. In the 1980 to 1981 and 1981 to 1982 postrainy seasons, a study was conducted on a medium deep Alfisol at the International Crop Research Institute for the Semi‐Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in central India, to examine the responses of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.), cv. Robut 33‐1, under three levels of soil water deficits during preflowering phase relative to an adequately irrigated control. Three intensities of drought were created (from 10–50 d after sowing [DAS]) using‐line source sprinkler irrigation, while the control was irrigated at 10‐d intervals. Moderate water deficits during the preflowering phase increased subsequent crop growth and pod growth rates in 1980 to 1981 but not in 1981 to 1982. Differences in flowering and total pod numbers between treatments were relatively small when compared to the subsequent differences in pod setting and maturity. In both seasons, greater synchrony of pod set in the moderately stressed plots resulted in a greater proportion of mature pods at final harvest. The most severely stressed plot had lower yields despite adequate irrigation subsequent to the preflowering water deficits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate preflowering water deficits increased later crop growth in 1980 to 1981 but not 1981 to 1982.

Material
Robut 33‐1e1
Treatment
Moderate water deficits during the preflowering phasee0
Outcome
subsequent crop growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 1980 to 1981 but not in 1981 to 1982e0
Comparator
an adequately irrigated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate water deficits during the preflowering phase increased subsequent crop growth and pod growth rates in 1980 to 1981 but not in 1981 to 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“responses of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.), cv. Robut 33‐1, under three levels of soil water deficits during preflowering phase relative to an adequately irrigated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate preflowering water deficits increased later pod growth rates in 1980 to 1981 but not 1981 to 1982.

Treatment
Moderate water deficits during the preflowering phasee0
Outcome
pod growth ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in 1980 to 1981 but not in 1981 to 1982e0
Comparator
an adequately irrigated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate water deficits during the preflowering phase increased subsequent crop growth and pod growth rates in 1980 to 1981 but not in 1981 to 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“responses of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.), cv. Robut 33‐1, under three levels of soil water deficits during preflowering phase relative to an adequately irrigated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment differences in flowering were relatively small compared with later pod setting and maturity differences.

Outcome
Differences in floweringe0
Direction
relatively smalle0
Comparator
subsequent differences in pod setting and maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences in flowering and total pod numbers between treatments were relatively small when compared to the subsequent differences in pod setting and maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1258 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment differences in total pod numbers were relatively small compared with later pod setting and maturity differences.

Outcome
total pod numberse0
Direction
relatively smalle0
Comparator
subsequent differences in pod setting and maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences in flowering and total pod numbers between treatments were relatively small when compared to the subsequent differences in pod setting and maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate stress increased synchrony of pod set in both seasons.

Treatment
moderately stressed plotse0
Outcome
synchrony of pod sete0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
In both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both seasons, greater synchrony of pod set in the moderately stressed plots resulted in a greater proportion of mature pods at final harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately stressed plots had a greater mature pod proportion at harvest in both seasons.

Treatment
moderately stressed plotse0
Outcome
proportion of mature pods at final harveste0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
In both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“In both seasons, greater synchrony of pod set in the moderately stressed plots resulted in a greater proportion of mature pods at final harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most severely stressed plot had lower yields despite later adequate irrigation.

Treatment
most severely stressed plote0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
despite adequate irrigation subsequent to the preflowering water deficitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most severely stressed plot had lower yields despite adequate irrigation subsequent to the preflowering water deficits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1527 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

58 papers: 20 positive, 38 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.