Paper · 2000 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Planting Density on Flower Bud Formation of 'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees Grafted on Dwarfing and Semi-dwarfing Rootstocks.

Haruyuki Kuroda; Kazuhiko Chiba

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of planting density on the flower bud formation on 'Starking Delicious' apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) grafted on dwarfing M.9 and M.26 and semidwarfing M.7 and MM.106 rootstocks and trained to a central leader was studied. 1. As planting density increased, the number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower bud formation decreased, but the number of flower buds per hectare tended to increase. 2. The relationship between the number of flower buds per tree (Z) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation. 1/Z=(1.46ρ+82.7)10-6 (1) Also, the relationship between the number of flower buds per hectare (δ) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation. 1/δ=1.46·10-6+82.7·10-6/ρ (3) 3. The number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower buds formed were negatively correlated to the tree height/spread ratio, indicating that the decrease of flower bud formation with an increased planting density was closely related to the upright form of the trees. 4. The vertical distribution of flower buds was closely related to the attenuation pattern of relative solar radiation along the canopy profile, indicating that the decrease of flower bud formation with an increased planting density was caused by decreasing of relative solar radiation. 5. In the 5th leaf of trees on M.9, an inhibition of 5% and more in flower buds formation occurred at higher density. As the trees aged, the inhibition shifted to the lower density plot. This shifting rate was accelerated in trees on M.26, M.7, and MM.106, compared with trees on M.9. The relationship between the percent of flower buds formed (φ) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation from the age of 6 years for trees/M.9 and 5 years for trees on other rootstocks, 1/φ=Aφρ+Bφ (4) where φ is 0≤φ≤100, and Aφ and Bφ depend on the tree age and rootstocks. 6. The φ remains constant at a lower LAI (F), whereas it decreased abruptly at a certain LAI. The relationship between the F and the φ could be approximated with the following two equations, In case of 0<F≤-b/2a, φ=-(b2/4a)+c (5) In case of F≥-b/2a, φ=aF2+bF+c (6) where a, b and c depend on the tree age and rootstocks. 7. LAI at which φ begins to decrease is defined as the critical LAI (Fφcri); Fφcri is expressed by the following equation. Fφcri=-b/2a (7) The Fφcri estimated by Eq. (7) had values of 1.9a2.1, regardless of tree age and rootstocks. 8. The relationship between the planting density (ρcri) and the number of flower buds per tree (ucri) at Fφcri, regardless of tree age and rootstocks, could be expressed as follows : ρcri=1.5×104·ucri-0.92 (10)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As planting density increased, the number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower bud formation decreased in apple trees.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower bud formatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As planting density increased, the number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower bud formation decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As planting density increased, the number of flower buds per hectare tended to increase.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of flower buds per hectaree0
Direction
tended to increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As planting density increased, the number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower bud formation decreased, but the number of flower buds per hectare tended to increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of flower buds per tree related to planting density by a reciprocal equation, 1/Z=(1.46ρ+82.7)10-6.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of flower buds per treee0
Value
1/Z=(1.46ρ+82.7)10-6e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the number of flower buds per tree (Z) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation. 1/Z=(1.46ρ+82.7)10-6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of flower buds per hectare related to planting density by a reciprocal equation, 1/δ=1.46·10-6+82.7·10-6/ρ.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of flower buds per hectaree0
Value
1/δ=1.46·10-6+82.7·10-6/ρe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship between the number of flower buds per hectare (δ) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation. 1/δ=1.46·10-6+82.7·10-6/ρ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower buds formed were negatively correlated with the tree height/spread ratio.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
tree height/spread ratioe0
Outcome
number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower buds formede0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: the correlate (tree height/spread ratio) is a tree trait, not an applied treatment; recorded in treatment for lack of a better field

Verbatim

e0

“The number of flower buds per tree and the percent of flower buds formed were negatively correlated to the tree height/spread ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the decrease in flower bud formation at increased planting density as closely related to the upright form of the trees.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
increased planting densitye0
Outcome
decrease of flower bud formatione0
Qualifier
upright form of the treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decrease of flower bud formation with an increased planting density was closely related to the upright form of the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vertical distribution of flower buds was closely related to the attenuation pattern of relative solar radiation along the canopy profile.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
attenuation pattern of relative solar radiatione0
Outcome
vertical distribution of flower budse0
Setting
canopy profilee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: the explanatory variable (light attenuation) is not an applied treatment; recorded in treatment

Verbatim

e0

“The vertical distribution of flower buds was closely related to the attenuation pattern of relative solar radiation along the canopy profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the decrease in flower bud formation at increased planting density was caused by decreasing relative solar radiation.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
decreasing of relative solar radiatione0
Outcome
decrease of flower bud formatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decrease of flower bud formation with an increased planting density was caused by decreasing of relative solar radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 5th leaf of trees on M.9, flower bud formation was inhibited by 5% and more at higher planting density.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Material
M.9e0
Organ / stage
5th leafe0
Treatment
higher densitye0
Outcome
flower buds formatione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
5% and moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the 5th leaf of trees on M.9, an inhibition of 5% and more in flower buds formation occurred at higher density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As the trees aged, the inhibition of flower bud formation shifted to the lower density plot.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
As the trees agede0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
shiftede0
Setting
lower density plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the trees aged, the inhibition shifted to the lower density plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shifting rate of inhibition was accelerated in trees on M.26, M.7 and MM.106 compared with trees on M.9.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Material
M.26, M.7, and MM.106e0
Outcome
shifting ratee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Comparator
trees on M.9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shifting rate was accelerated in trees on M.26, M.7, and MM.106, compared with trees on M.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percent of flower buds formed related to planting density by the reciprocal equation 1/φ=Aφρ+Bφ from age 6 years for trees on M.9 and 5 years for other rootstocks.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
percent of flower buds formede0
Value
1/φ=Aφρ+Bφe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the percent of flower buds formed (φ) and the planting density (ρ) could be represented by the following reciprocal equation from the age of 6 years for trees/M.9 and 5 years for trees on other rootstocks, 1/φ=Aφρ+Bφ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percent of flower buds formed (φ) remained constant at a lower LAI but decreased abruptly at a certain LAI.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
φe0
Qualifier
remains constant at a lower LAI (F), whereas it decreased abruptly at a certain LAIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The φ remains constant at a lower LAI (F), whereas it decreased abruptly at a certain LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2055 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical LAI at which flower bud percentage begins to decrease had values of 1.9 to 2.1, regardless of tree age and rootstocks.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
Fφcrie0
Value
1.9a2.1e0
Qualifier
regardless of tree age and rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fφcri estimated by Eq. (7) had values of 1.9a2.1, regardless of tree age and rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2423–2514 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the critical LAI, planting density related to flower buds per tree as ρcri=1.5×104·ucri-0.92, regardless of tree age and rootstocks.

Taxon
Apple TreesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
number of flower buds per treee0
Value
ρcri=1.5×104·ucri-0.92e0
Qualifier
regardless of tree age and rootstockse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between the planting density (ρcri) and the number of flower buds per tree (ucri) at Fφcri, regardless of tree age and rootstocks, could be expressed as follows : ρcri=1.5×104·ucri-0.92”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2519–2721 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Starking Delicious' Apple Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑