Paper · 1996 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effect of Water Stress on Pyruvaté, Pi Dikinase and Phosphoenol Pyruvate Carboxylase Activities in the Leaves of Two Cultivars of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

D. Contour‐Ansel; G. Ilami; A. Ouarzane; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of withholding water on the specific activities of pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase (PPDK EC 2.7.9.1.) and phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase (PEPC, EC 4.1.1.31) was studied in two cultivars of Sorghum bicolor L. different in their sensitivity to water deficit. The drought sensitive cultivar ICSV 1063 and the more resistant cultivar MIGSOR were subjected to water deficit in controlled conditions. The results showed a decrease in both enzyme specific activities, higher for drought sensitive cultivar ICSV 1063, when leaf water potential (Ψ) was lowered to ‐2.3 MPa. Following rewatering, enzyme specific activities increased in both cultivars, with the increase being more significant in MIGSOR. Relative water content (RWC) decreased significantly for water‐stressed ICSV 1063 cultivar, lower for MIGSOR and returned quickly to that of control plants upon rehydration. Net photosynthesis showed a decrease for water‐stressed plants, higher for ICSV 1063. At minimal Ψ, net photosynthesis was completely inhibited, with the stomata being closed After rehydration, MIGSOR showed a better recovery in photosynthesis but never reached the initial values of day 0. Water stress had a striking effect, both on net photosynthesis by regulation of stomatal aperture and on PPDK and PEPC activities, although the enzymes were still active when photosynthesis ceased. Therefore the level of PPDK and PEPC activities may contribute to the limitation of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased both enzyme activities, more in ICSV 1063 at -2.3 MPa.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Material
ICSV 1063e0
Treatment
leaf water potential (Ψ) was lowered to ‐2.3 MPae0
Outcome
both enzyme specific activitiese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in both enzyme specific activities, higher for drought sensitive cultivar ICSV 1063, when leaf water potential (Ψ) was lowered to ‐2.3 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering increased both enzyme activities, more significantly in MIGSOR.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Material
MIGSORe0
Treatment
rewateringe0
Outcome
enzyme specific activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Following rewatering, enzyme specific activities increased in both cultivars, with the increase being more significant in MIGSOR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced relative water content in ICSV 1063, less in MIGSOR.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Material
ICSV 1063e0
Treatment
water‐stressede0
Outcome
Relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water content (RWC) decreased significantly for water‐stressed ICSV 1063 cultivar, lower for MIGSOR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content quickly recovered after rehydration.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
Relative water content (RWC)e1
Direction
returnede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“returned quickly to that of control plants upon rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative water content (RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased net photosynthesis, more in ICSV 1063.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Material
ICSV 1063e0
Treatment
water‐stressede0
Outcome
Net photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis showed a decrease for water‐stressed plants, higher for ICSV 1063”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At minimal water potential, photosynthesis was completely inhibited and stomata closed.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Outcome
net photosynthesis was completely inhibited, with the stomata being closede0
Qualifier
minimal Ψe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At minimal Ψ, net photosynthesis was completely inhibited, with the stomata being closed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MIGSOR photosynthesis recovered better after rehydration but stayed below day-zero values.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Material
MIGSORe0
Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
recovery in photosynthesise0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
initial values of day 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After rehydration, MIGSOR showed a better recovery in photosynthesis but never reached the initial values of day 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPDK and PEPC remained active when photosynthesis ceased.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Gene
PPDK and PEPCe1
Outcome
enzymes were still active when photosynthesis ceasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the enzymes were still active when photosynthesis ceased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“on PPDK and PEPC activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest PPDK and PEPC activity may limit carbon dioxide fixation.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolor L.Sorghum bicolort0
Gene
PPDK and PEPCe0
Outcome
limitation of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of PPDK and PEPC activities may contribute to the limitation of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.