Paper · 1970 · Biologia Plantarum

The effect of light intensity on stomatal frequency in leaves ofIris hollandica hort., var. wedgwood

J. Pazourek

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Stomatal frequency in leaves of plants of Iris hollandica, cultivated under four light intensities, about 12%, 37%, 75% and 100% of natural daylight, was studied. The stomatal frequency decreases with lower light intensities. The gradients of stomatal frequency of successive leaves show an increase up to the third or fourth leaf with a subsequent decrease of values up to the highest leaf. The total number of stomata per leaf is not constant; differences exist in successive leaves of a shoot as well as among the leaves of plants growing under various light intensities. The character of gradients was changed at lower light intensities. The largest reaction to the light intensity appeared in leaves with higher stomatal frequency. The gradients in individual leaves depend on the insertion of the leaf. Both the shape and the slope of these gradients are influenced by the light intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal frequency decreased under lower light intensity.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
lower light intensitiese1
Outcome
stomatal frequencye1
Direction
decreasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal frequency in leaves of plants of Iris hollandica, cultivated under four light intensities, about 12%, 37%, 75% and 100% of natural daylight, was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“The stomatal frequency decreases with lower light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal frequency increased across successive leaves to the third or fourth leaf, then decreased up to the highest leaf.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Organ / stage
successive leavese1
Outcome
stomatal frequencye1
Direction
an increase up to the third or fourth leaf with a subsequent decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The gradients of stomatal frequency of successive leaves show an increase up to the third or fourth leaf with a subsequent decrease of values up to the highest leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total stomata per leaf varied among successive leaves of a shoot and among plants grown under different light intensities.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
total number of stomata per leafe1
Direction
not constante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total number of stomata per leaf is not constant; differences exist in successive leaves of a shoot as well as among the leaves of plants growing under various light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light intensities changed the character of stomatal frequency gradients.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Treatment
lower light intensitiese1
Outcome
character of gradientse1
Direction
changede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The character of gradients was changed at lower light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–641 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves with higher stomatal frequency showed the largest response to light intensity.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
reaction to the light intensitye1
Direction
largeste1
Comparator
higher stomatal frequencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The largest reaction to the light intensity appeared in leaves with higher stomatal frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gradients within individual leaves depended on leaf insertion.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Organ / stage
individual leavese1
Outcome
gradientse1
Qualifier
insertion of the leafe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The gradients in individual leaves depend on the insertion of the leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity influenced the shape and slope of leaf gradients.

Taxon
Iris hollandicaIris ×hollandicae0
Treatment
light intensitye1
Outcome
shape and the slope of these gradientse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Iris x hollandica
Iris ×hollandica · TaxonHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iris hollandica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both the shape and the slope of these gradients are influenced by the light intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–895 · show in text ↑