Abstract
Abstract Field trials at Summerland and Creston in 1984 and 1985 on loam soils naturally intested with Agrobadonum nonfactures showed that A radiobacter Strain 84 K‐S4, did not control crown gall on Antonovka apple seedlingy when applied as a root‐dip. K‐84 controiled crown gall at Sidney on sandy loam soil m 1984 and 1985, but tailed in 1986. At Creston, higher than standard concentrations of K‐84 did not control crown gall of seedlings, whether the seedlings were grown in unsterililzed soil 1986) or in sterile soil, 1987 before transplanting them into A nonfactures naturally intested soil. It a field trial in 1986 at Summerland, root‐dip treatment with K‐84 alone or in combination with broadeast treatments of melam‐sodium of formalin tailed to control crown gall on Antonovka seedlings. However, crown gall intection was significantly reduced with metam‐sodium or K‐84 treatment alone when seedlings were raised in sterile soil before transplanting in naturally instead safe at Summerland in 1987.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Strain 84 root dip did not control crown gall on Antonovka apple seedlings at Summerland and Creston.
- Taxon
- Apple Seedlings
Malus domesticat0 - Material
- Antonovkae0
- Treatment
- root‐dipe0
- Interactor
- A radiobacter Strain 84 K‐S4
Agrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- crown galle0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“A radiobacter Strain 84 K‐S4, did not control crown gall on Antonovka apple seedlingy when applied as a root‐dip”
Claim · model-written summary
K-84 controlled crown gall at Sidney in 1984 and 1985.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- K‐84e0
- Outcome
- crown galle0
- Direction
- controilede0
- Setting
- Sidneye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“K‐84 controiled crown gall at Sidney on sandy loam soil m 1984 and 1985, but tailed in 1986”
Claim · model-written summary
K-84 failed to control crown gall at Sidney in 1986.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- K‐84e0
- Outcome
- crown galle0
- Direction
- tailede0
- Qualifier
- 1986e0
- Setting
- Sidneye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“K‐84 controiled crown gall at Sidney on sandy loam soil m 1984 and 1985, but tailed in 1986”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher than standard K-84 concentrations did not control seedling crown gall at Creston.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- higher than standard concentrations of K‐84e0
- Outcome
- crown gall of seedlingse0
- Direction
- did not controle0
- Comparator
- standard concentrationse0
- Setting
- Crestone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“At Creston, higher than standard concentrations of K‐84 did not control crown gall of seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
K-84 alone failed to control crown gall at Summerland in 1986.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Material
- Antonovkae0
- Treatment
- K‐84 alonee0
- Outcome
- crown galle0
- Direction
- tailed to controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“root‐dip treatment with K‐84 alone or in combination with broadeast treatments of melam‐sodium of formalin tailed to control crown gall on Antonovka seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
K-84 combined with broadcast treatments failed to control crown gall at Summerland in 1986.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- K‐84 alone or in combination with broadeast treatments of melam‐sodium of formaline0
- Outcome
- crown galle0
- Direction
- tailed to controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“root‐dip treatment with K‐84 alone or in combination with broadeast treatments of melam‐sodium of formalin tailed to control crown gall on Antonovka seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Metam-sodium significantly reduced crown gall infection after seedlings were raised in sterile soil.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- metam‐sodiume0
- Outcome
- crown gall intectione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- when seedlings were raised in sterile soile0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“crown gall intection was significantly reduced with metam‐sodium or K‐84 treatment alone when seedlings were raised in sterile soil”
Claim · model-written summary
K-84 alone significantly reduced crown gall infection after seedlings were raised in sterile soil.
- Taxon
- Apple SeedlingsMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- K‐84 treatment alonee0
- Outcome
- crown gall intectione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- when seedlings were raised in sterile soile0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Apple Seedlings”
e0“crown gall intection was significantly reduced with metam‐sodium or K‐84 treatment alone when seedlings were raised in sterile soil”
The same questions in other papers
metam-sodium · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.