Paper · 2004 · Weed Technology

Weed Management in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn with Glyphosate and Halosulfuron

Walter E. Thomas; Ian C. Burke; John W. Wilcut

20
claims
59
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three field studies were conducted at Lewiston Woodville, NC, in 2001 and 2002 to evaluate crop tolerance, weed control, grain yield, and net returns in glyphosate-resistant corn with various herbicide systems. Crop injury, weed control, and grain yield were not influenced by glyphosate formulation. Atrazine preemergence (PRE) and atrazine plus metolachlor PRE, averaged over postemergence (POST) systems, controlled Texas panicum at least 80 and 87%, respectively. Sequential glyphosate applications (early postemergence [EPOST] followed by [fb] POST) provided at least 99% control of Texas panicum compared with at least 86 and 88% control with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST, respectively. Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate system controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass 89 to 100% and 94 to 100%, respectively. Sequential glyphosate treatments controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass at least 99 and 95%, respectively. Regardless of PRE system, glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential applications of glyphosate controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarters at least 99%, whereas glyphosate EPOST alone provided at least 88 and 96% control, respectively. Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and glyphosate sequentially controlled yellow nutsedge similarly and more consistently than glyphosate EPOST. Regardless of PRE treatment, sequential glyphosate applications provided at least 98% control of entireleaf and pitted morningglory, whereas glyphosate EPOST controlled at least 64 and 62%, respectively. Glyphosate EPOST and the sequential glyphosate EPOST fb POST systems yielded similarly at all three locations. Net returns were highest at all three locations with the glyphosate sequential system, with similar net returns obtained with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST at two and one locations, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate formulation did not influence corn injury, weed control or grain yield.

Treatment
glyphosate formulatione0
Outcome
Crop injury, weed control, and grain yielde0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop injury, weed control, and grain yield were not influenced by glyphosate formulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine PRE controlled Texas panicum at least 80%.

Treatment
Atrazine preemergence (PRE)e0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
controlled Texas panicume0
Direction
controllede0
Value
80e0
Comparator
postemergence (POST) systemse0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine preemergence (PRE) and atrazine plus metolachlor PRE, averaged over postemergence (POST) systems, controlled Texas panicum at least 80 and 87%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE controlled Texas panicum at least 87%.

Treatment
atrazine plus metolachlor PREe0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
controlled Texas panicume0
Direction
controllede0
Value
87%e0
Comparator
postemergence (POST) systemse0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine preemergence (PRE) and atrazine plus metolachlor PRE, averaged over postemergence (POST) systems, controlled Texas panicum at least 80 and 87%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate controlled Texas panicum at least 99%.

Treatment
Sequential glyphosate applicationse0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
control of Texas panicume0
Direction
controle0
Value
99%e0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential glyphosate applications (early postemergence [EPOST] followed by [fb] POST) provided at least 99% control of Texas panicum compared with at least 86 and 88% control with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST controlled Texas panicum at least 86%.

Treatment
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
86e0
Comparator
glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at least 86 and 88% control with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST controlled Texas panicum at least 88%.

Treatment
glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOSTe0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
88%e0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at least 86 and 88% control with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE followed by glyphosate controlled large crabgrass 89 to 100%.

Treatment
Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate systeme0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
controlled large crabgrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
89 to 100%e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate system controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass 89 to 100% and 94 to 100%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE followed by glyphosate controlled goosegrass 94 to 100%.

Treatment
Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate systeme0
Interactor
goosegrasse0weed
Outcome
goosegrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
94 to 100%e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate system controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass 89 to 100% and 94 to 100%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate controlled large crabgrass at least 99%.

Treatment
Sequential glyphosate treatmentse0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
controlled large crabgrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
99e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential glyphosate treatments controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass at least 99 and 95%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate controlled goosegrass at least 95%.

Treatment
Sequential glyphosate treatmentse0
Interactor
goosegrasse0weed
Outcome
goosegrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
95%e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequential glyphosate treatments controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass at least 99 and 95%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential glyphosate controlled ragweed and lambsquarters at least 99%.

Treatment
glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential applications of glyphosatee0
Interactor
common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifoliae0weed
Outcome
controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarterse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
99%e0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOST alonee0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia artemisiifolia
Ambrosia artemisiifolia · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of PRE system, glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential applications of glyphosate controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarters at least 99%, whereas glyphosate EPOST alone provided at least 88 and 96% control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST alone controlled common ragweed at least 88%.

Treatment
glyphosate EPOST alonee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
88e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate EPOST alone provided at least 88 and 96% control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST alone controlled common lambsquarters at least 96%.

Treatment
glyphosate EPOST alonee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
96%e0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate EPOST alone provided at least 88 and 96% control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential glyphosate controlled yellow nutsedge similarly and more consistently than glyphosate EPOST.

Treatment
Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and glyphosate sequentiallye0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
controlled yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
more consistentlye0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and glyphosate sequentially controlled yellow nutsedge similarly and more consistently than glyphosate EPOST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate controlled entireleaf and pitted morningglory at least 98%.

Treatment
sequential glyphosate applicationse0
Interactor
entireleafe0weed
Outcome
control of entireleaf and pitted morningglorye0
Direction
controle0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of PRE treatment, sequential glyphosate applications provided at least 98% control of entireleaf and pitted morningglory, whereas glyphosate EPOST controlled at least 64 and 62%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST controlled entireleaf morningglory at least 64%.

Treatment
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
64e0
Comparator
sequential glyphosate applicationse0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of PRE treatment, sequential glyphosate applications provided at least 98% control of entireleaf and pitted morningglory, whereas glyphosate EPOST controlled at least 64 and 62%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST controlled pitted morningglory at least 62%.

Treatment
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Outcome
controllede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
62%e0
Comparator
sequential glyphosate applicationse0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of PRE treatment, sequential glyphosate applications provided at least 98% control of entireleaf and pitted morningglory, whereas glyphosate EPOST controlled at least 64 and 62%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST and sequential glyphosate yielded similarly at all three locations.

Treatment
sequential glyphosate EPOST fb POST systemse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
Glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate EPOST and the sequential glyphosate EPOST fb POST systems yielded similarly at all three locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate produced the highest net returns at all three locations.

Treatment
glyphosate sequential systeme0
Outcome
Net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns were highest at all three locations with the glyphosate sequential system, with similar net returns obtained with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST at two and one locations, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST gave similar net returns at two and one locations, respectively.

Treatment
glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOSTe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
glyphosate EPOSTe0
Setting
Lewiston Woodville, NCt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar net returns obtained with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST at two and one locations, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lewiston Woodville, NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–60 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

glyphosate · Ambrosia artemisiifolia · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Halosulfuron-methyl · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

metolachlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

glyphosate · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.