Paper · 2010 · Crop Science

Comparisons of Genetically Modified and Non‐Genetically Modified Soybean Cultivars and Weed Management Systems

M. D. K. Owen; P. Pedersen; J. L. De Bruin; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Adoption of glyphosate‐resistant crops and the use of glyphosate has resulted in the evolution of glyphosate‐resistant weeds. The objective of the studies reported was to investigate yield and weed management systems of genetically modified (GM) and non‐GM soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] at three Iowa locations during 2007 and 2008. Yield of glyphosate‐resistant, glufosinate‐resistant, and non‐GM cultivars was determined in six site–years. The non‐GM cultivars yielded 315 and 265 kg ha −1 less than the glyphosate‐resistant and glufosinate‐resistant cultivars, respectively, while no differences between GM cultivars were observed. Weed management systems differed for the cultivars but had equivalent weed control (>90%). Weed management systems in the non‐GM cultivars caused more phytotoxicity (36% versus approximately 5% 7 d after application) and, coincidentally, the non‐GM cultivars had the lowest yields. No differences in phytotoxicity were observed among the weed management systems for the GM cultivars. Similarly, no differences in yield were observed comparing the weed management systems for the GM cultivars. The experiment locations did not have high weed population densities although the untreated controls yielded 48% less than the other weed management systems included in the studies. Given concerns for glyphosate‐resistant weeds, the studies demonstrated that acceptable and equivalent options to glyphosate‐resistant soybean exist to manage glyphosate‐resistant weeds in maturity groups 2 and 3 soybean which represent the majority of the U.S. soybean production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-GM cultivars yielded 315 kg ha −1 less than glyphosate-resistant cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
non‐GM cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
lesse0
Value
315 and 265 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
glyphosate‐resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non‐GM cultivars yielded 315 and 265 kg ha −1 less than the glyphosate‐resistant and glufosinate‐resistant cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–580 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-GM cultivars yielded 265 kg ha −1 less than glufosinate-resistant cultivars.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
non‐GM cultivarse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
lesse0
Value
265 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
glufosinate‐resistant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non‐GM cultivars yielded 315 and 265 kg ha −1 less than the glyphosate‐resistant and glufosinate‐resistant cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–580 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GM cultivar types had no observed yield difference.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
GM cultivarse0
Outcome
differencese0
Direction
no differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences between GM cultivars were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–637 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management systems achieved equivalent weed control exceeding 90%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Weed management systemse0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
equivalente0
Value
>90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management systems differed for the cultivars but had equivalent weed control (>90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-GM systems caused more phytotoxicity, 36% versus about 5%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Weed management systems in the non‐GM cultivarse0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
moree0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
approximately 5% 7 d after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management systems in the non‐GM cultivars caused more phytotoxicity (36% versus approximately 5% 7 d after application)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM management systems showed no phytotoxicity differences.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
GM cultivarse0
Treatment
weed management systemse0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in phytotoxicity were observed among the weed management systems for the GM cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM management systems showed no yield differences.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
GM cultivarse0
Treatment
weed management systemse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in yield were observed comparing the weed management systems for the GM cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated controls yielded 48% less than other management systems.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
untreated controlse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
lesse0
Value
48%e0
Comparator
other weed management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the untreated controls yielded 48% less than the other weed management systems included in the studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1312 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–290 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that equivalent alternatives to glyphosate-resistant soybean exist.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
acceptable and equivalent options to glyphosate‐resistant soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acceptable and equivalent options to glyphosate‐resistant soybean exist to manage glyphosate‐resistant weeds in maturity groups 2 and 3 soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1534 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 35 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.