Paper · 2010 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Mycorrhizal colonization and grain Cd concentration of field‐grown durum wheat in response to tillage, preceding crop and phosphorus fertilization

Xiaopeng Gao; Fardausi Akhter; Mario Tenuta; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
42
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). The relationship between grain Cd and soil and plant variables was explored to determine the primary factors affecting grain Cd concentration. RESULTS: Mycorrhizal colonization of the roots was reduced by conventional tillage or when the preceding crop was canola (Brassica napus L.), compared to minimum tillage or when the preceding crop was flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). In contrast, grain Cd was not consistently affected by any treatment. Grain Cd was generally below the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of 100 microg Cd kg(-1) proposed by WHO. Grain Cd varied substantially from year to year, and could be predicted with 70% of variance accounted for by using the model: grain Cd concentration = - 321.9 + 44.5x ln(grain yield) + 0.26x soil DTPA-Cd + 182.5x soil electrical conductivity (EC)- 0.98x grain Zn concentration. CONCLUSIONS: These common agricultural management practices had no effect on grain Cd concentration in durum wheat though they impacted mycorrhizal colonization of roots. Grain yield and to a lesser extent soil conditions of EC and DTPA-Cd and grain Zn influenced grain Cd, whereas mycorrhizal colonization levels did not.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional rather than minimum tillage reduced mycorrhizal colonization of durum wheat roots.

Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie0symbiont
Outcome
Mycorrhizal colonization of the rootse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
minimum tillagee1
Setting
3-year field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal colonization of the roots was reduced by conventional tillage or when the preceding crop was canola (Brassica napus L.), compared to minimum tillage or when the preceding crop was flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization of durum wheat roots was reduced when the preceding crop was canola rather than flax.

Treatment
preceding crop was canolae1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie0symbiont
Outcome
Mycorrhizal colonization of the rootse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
preceding crop was flaxe1
Setting
3-year field triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal colonization of the roots was reduced by conventional tillage or when the preceding crop was canola (Brassica napus L.), compared to minimum tillage or when the preceding crop was flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Cd was not consistently affected by tillage, preceding crop or phosphate fertilization.

Treatment
tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain Cde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast, grain Cd was not consistently affected by any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Cd was generally below the maximum permissible concentration of 100 microg Cd kg(-1) proposed by WHO.

Outcome
Grain Cde3
Direction
belowe3
Comparator
maximum permissible concentration (MPC)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain Cd was generally below the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) of 100 microg Cd kg(-1) proposed by WHO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Cd varied substantially from year to year.

Outcome
Grain Cde4
Qualifier
varied substantially from year to yeare4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain Cd varied substantially from year to year, and could be predicted with 70% of variance accounted for by using the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–990 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A regression model of grain yield, soil and grain variables predicted grain Cd with 70% of variance accounted for.

Outcome
variance accounted fore4
Value
70%e4
Qualifier
Grain Cde4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain Cd varied substantially from year to year, and could be predicted with 70% of variance accounted for by using the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–990 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield influenced grain Cd, to a greater extent than soil conditions.

Organ / stage
graine5
Outcome
grain Cde5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield and to a lesser extent soil conditions of EC and DTPA-Cd and grain Zn influenced grain Cd, whereas mycorrhizal colonization levels did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil conditions of EC and DTPA-Cd and grain Zn influenced grain Cd to a lesser extent than grain yield.

Compound
DTPA-Cde5
Outcome
grain Cde5
Qualifier
to a lesser extente5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield and to a lesser extent soil conditions of EC and DTPA-Cd and grain Zn influenced grain Cd, whereas mycorrhizal colonization levels did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1465 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonization levels did not influence grain Cd.

Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie0symbiont
Outcome
grain Cde5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 3-year field trial was conducted to investigate the effect of agricultural management practices including tillage, preceding crop and phosphate fertilization on root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and grain cadmium (Cd) concentration of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yield and to a lesser extent soil conditions of EC and DTPA-Cd and grain Zn influenced grain Cd, whereas mycorrhizal colonization levels did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1465 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · disease · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.