Paper · 2008 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Studies on the epidemiology and control of Ascochyta blight of peas (Pisum sativum L) caused byAscochyta pinodes

Sangeetha Panicker; B. Ramraj

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The disease progress, survival, spread and control of Ascochyta blight of field Peas caused by Ascochyta pinodes J. was studied. Disease progress curve and rate curve were constructed and for disease prediction four important models viz., Gompertz, Logistic, Exponential, and Monomolecular were applied. It was found that the exponential model gave the best fit for disease progress of Ascochyta blight. Studies on the soil survival of the pathogen showed that in fields where the previous crop was peas the population of Ascochyta increased from 12.6 × 103 cfu/g of soil at sowing to 25.9 × 103 cfu/g of soil at time of harvest and they survived in soil even up to one year after harvest. Among the different chemicals tested against A. pinodes, seed treatment of Thiram followed by Chlorothalonil spray reduced the PDI to 21.5 compared to 82.0 in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the Gompertz, Logistic, Exponential and Monomolecular models applied to predict disease, the exponential model gave the best fit for the progress of Ascochyta blight in peas.

Outcome
best fite0
Comparator
Gompertz, Logistic, Exponential, and Monomoleculare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“for disease prediction four important models viz., Gompertz, Logistic, Exponential, and Monomolecular were applied. It was found that the exponential model gave the best fit for disease progress of Ascochyta blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fields where the previous crop was peas, the soil population of Ascochyta increased from 12.6 × 103 cfu/g at sowing to 25.9 × 103 cfu/g at harvest.

Interactor
AscochytaAscochytae0pathogen
Outcome
population of Ascochytae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
from 12.6 × 103 cfu/g of soil at sowing to 25.9 × 103 cfu/g of soil at time of harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta
Ascochyta · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in fields where the previous crop was peas the population of Ascochyta increased from 12.6 × 103 cfu/g of soil at sowing to 25.9 × 103 cfu/g of soil at time of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ascochyta pathogen survived in soil for up to one year after the pea harvest.

Interactor
Ascochyta pinodesDidymella pinodest1pathogen
Outcome
survived in soile0
Qualifier
up to one year after harveste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Didymella pinodes
Didymella pinodes · InteractorWheelwalker · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85 · show in text ↑
t1

“Ascochyta pinodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“they survived in soil even up to one year after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with Thiram followed by a Chlorothalonil spray reduced the percent disease index of Ascochyta blight in peas to 21.5, compared with 82.0 in the control.

Treatment
seed treatment of Thiram followed by Chlorothalonil spraye0
Interactor
A. pinodesDidymella pinodese0pathogen
Outcome
PDIe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21.5e0
Qualifier
82.0 in controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Didymella pinodes
Didymella pinodes · InteractorWheelwalker · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the different chemicals tested against A. pinodes, seed treatment of Thiram followed by Chlorothalonil spray reduced the PDI to 21.5 compared to 82.0 in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–865 · show in text ↑

thiram · Didymella pinodes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorothalonil · Didymella pinodes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Didymella pinodes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.