Paper · 2007 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen and Tillage Effects on Wheat Leaf Spot Diseases in the Northern Great Plains

J. M. Krupinsky; A. D. Halvorson; D. L. Tanaka; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There is a need for management practices in cropping systems that can reduce the impact of plant diseases. Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr to determine the influence of tillage, N fertilization, and cultivar on disease severity in a long‐term cropping system project, which included two cropping systems {spring wheat (SWF)–fallow and annual cropping [spring wheat (SWA)–winter wheat (WWA)–sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.)]}. The major leaf spot diseases were tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch. In low precipitation years, the impacts of management practices on leaf spot disease severity were minimal. No‐till (NT) did not consistently increase the severity of leaf spot diseases. During the drier years, NT had the advantage of conserving soil water while not increasing the risk to leaf spot diseases. When N treatments influenced leaf spot disease severity, higher levels of disease severity were associated with the low‐N fertilizer treatment compared with higher levels of N fertilization. When a tillage × N treatment interaction was significant, disease severity was higher with NT at the low N treatment, but at the high N treatment the differences among tillage treatments were greatly reduced or eliminated. This indicates an advantage of using adequate N fertilizer especially with NT under our environmental conditions. When differences in leaf spot diseases for cultivars were evident, Roughrider winter wheat had higher levels of disease severity compared with Norstar; however, the differences between the spring wheat cultivars Butte86 and Stoa were not consistent for both cropping systems. Producers should integrate a combination of management practices to develop a consistent long‐term strategy for disease management suited to their production system and location.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In low precipitation years, management practices had minimal impact on leaf spot disease severity in wheat.

Treatment
management practicese1
Outcome
leaf spot disease severitye1
Direction
minimale1
Qualifier
In low precipitation yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“In low precipitation years, the impacts of management practices on leaf spot disease severity were minimal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till did not consistently increase leaf spot disease severity in wheat.

Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
severity of leaf spot diseasese1
Direction
did not consistently increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“did not consistently increase the severity of leaf spot diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During drier years, no-till conserved soil water in wheat.

Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
soil watere2
Direction
conservinge2
Qualifier
During the drier yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the drier years, NT had the advantage of conserving soil water while not increasing the risk to leaf spot diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During drier years, no-till did not increase the risk to leaf spot diseases in wheat.

Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
risk to leaf spot diseasese2
Direction
not increasinge2
Qualifier
During the drier yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the drier years, NT had the advantage of conserving soil water while not increasing the risk to leaf spot diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–856 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen fertilizer treatment was associated with higher leaf spot disease severity in wheat than higher N fertilization.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmente3
Outcome
disease severitye1
Direction
highere3
Comparator
higher levels of N fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher levels of disease severity were associated with the”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–973 · show in text ↑
e3

“fertilizer treatment compared with higher levels of N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With no-till at the low N treatment, disease severity was higher in wheat.

Treatment
NTe4
Outcome
disease severitye4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
at the low N treatmente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e4

“disease severity was higher with NT at the low N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the high N treatment, differences among tillage treatments in wheat disease severity were greatly reduced or eliminated.

Treatment
high N treatmente5
Outcome
differences among tillage treatmentse5
Direction
greatly reduced or eliminatede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e5

“at the high N treatment the differences among tillage treatments were greatly reduced or eliminated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1270 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate nitrogen fertilizer gives wheat an advantage under no-till in these conditions.

Outcome
using adequate N fertilizere6
Qualifier
under our environmental conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e6

“This indicates an advantage of using adequate N fertilizer especially with NT under our environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1384 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roughrider winter wheat had higher leaf spot disease severity than Norstar.

Material
Roughrider winter wheate7
Outcome
disease severitye7
Direction
higher levelse7
Comparator
Norstare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e7

“Roughrider winter wheat had higher levels of disease severity compared with Norstar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in leaf spot disease between spring wheat cultivars Butte86 and Stoa were not consistent across both cropping systems.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Butte86 and Stoae1
Outcome
differences between the spring wheat cultivarse1
Direction
were not consistente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the differences between the spring wheat cultivars Butte86 and Stoa were not consistent for both cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Producers should combine management practices into a consistent long-term strategy for wheat disease management.

Outcome
strategy for disease managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf spot diseases on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) were evaluated for 11 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“Producers should integrate a combination of management practices to develop a consistent long‐term strategy for disease management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1792 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 51 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.