Paper · 1971 · Plant Pathology

Comparison of a Copper and a Mercury Spray Programme Against Apple Canker ( Nectria galligena Bres.)

Margery Bennett

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY An autumn and spring spray programme of copper (as a proprietary wettable Bordeaux) was compared with a similar programme with an organomercury (PMC) fungicide for the control of apple canker caused by Nectria galligena in three successive years. Inoculum was provided prior to the spray applications and no cankers were removed during the trial. Fewer cankers developed on the trees receiving mercury sprays than on those sprayed with copper in each of the three seasons 1968 to 1970. However, spore counts made from rain run‐off revealed a relatively higher inoculum on the mercury sprayed trees, which might constitute a hazard when the protective effect of the sprays ceased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer cankers developed on apple trees sprayed with mercury than on trees sprayed with copper in each of three seasons.

Treatment
mercury sprayse1
Interactor
Nectria galligenaNeonectria galligenae0pathogen
Outcome
cankerse1
Direction
Fewere1
Comparator
coppere1
Setting
three seasons 1968 to 1970e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neonectria galligena
Neonectria galligena · InteractorAbrahami · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An autumn and spring spray programme of copper (as a proprietary wettable Bordeaux) was compared with a similar programme with an organomercury (PMC) fungicide for the control of apple canker caused by Nectria galligena in three successive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fewer cankers developed on the trees receiving mercury sprays than on those sprayed with copper in each of the three seasons 1968 to 1970”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spore counts from rain run-off were higher on apple trees sprayed with mercury.

Treatment
mercury sprayed treese2
Interactor
Nectria galligenaNeonectria galligenae0pathogen
Outcome
spore countse2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Neonectria galligena
Neonectria galligena · InteractorAbrahami · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An autumn and spring spray programme of copper (as a proprietary wettable Bordeaux) was compared with a similar programme with an organomercury (PMC) fungicide for the control of apple canker caused by Nectria galligena in three successive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–253 · show in text ↑
e2

“spore counts made from rain run-off revealed a relatively higher inoculum on the mercury sprayed trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 503–605 · show in text ↑

mercury atom · Neonectria galligena · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Neonectria galligena · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.