Paper · 1983 · Journal of Phytopathology

Carbon Dioxide Exchange in an Incompatible Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination

D. R. Walters; P. G. Ayres

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract CO 2 exchanges in intact barley leaves were studied by infra red gas analysis after inoculation with an incompatible race of powdery mildew. Net photosynthesis was inhibited, and dark and photorespiration were stimulated, by inoculation. The increase in respiratory processes was approximately equal to the change in net photosynthesis indicating that CO 2 fixation, “gross photosynthesis”, was unaffected by inoculation. It is concluded that changes in net photosynthesis may be the primary cause of the reduced quantity and quality of grain in incompatible barley/mildew combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation inhibited net photosynthesis in barley leaves.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
powdery mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
Net photosynthesise0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“Net photosynthesis was inhibited, and dark and photorespiration were stimulated, by inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation stimulated dark respiration in barley leaves.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
powdery mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
darke0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“dark and photorespiration were stimulated, by inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation stimulated photorespiration in barley leaves.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
powdery mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
photorespiratione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“photorespiration were stimulated, by inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The respiratory increase approximately equaled the change in net photosynthesis.

Interactor
powdery mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
respiratory processese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
change in net photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in respiratory processes was approximately equal to the change in net photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that inoculation left gross photosynthesis unaffected.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
powdery mildewt0pathogen
Outcome
CO 2 fixatione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“CO 2 fixation, “gross photosynthesis”, was unaffected by inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–429 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that changed net photosynthesis may primarily cause reduced grain quantity and quality in incompatible barley/mildew combinations.

Interactor
mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
reduced quantity and quality of graine0
Qualifier
changes in net photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley/Powdery Mildew Combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“changes in net photosynthesis may be the primary cause of the reduced quantity and quality of grain in incompatible barley/mildew combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–594 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.