Paper · 1959 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Relative Water Losses by Evaporation and Transpiration in Field Corn

D. B. Peters; M. B. Russell

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The separation of transpiration by corn and evaporation from the soil was experimentally accomplished, in the field, by covering the ground surface with polyethylene plastic. It was found that as much as 50% of total evapotranspiration could be accounted for by evaporation from the soil surface. Transpiration was found to be influenced in a minor way by plant population and soil moisture environment. Corn yields were depressed in only 1 year by elimination of summer rainfall.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil surface evaporation accounted for as much as 50% of total evapotranspiration.

Outcome
evaporation from the soil surfacee0
Value
50% of total evapotranspiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as much as 50% of total evapotranspiration could be accounted for by evaporation from the soil surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population had a minor influence on corn transpiration.

Treatment
plant populatione0
Outcome
Transpiratione0
Qualifier
in a minor waye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration was found to be influenced in a minor way by plant population and soil moisture environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture environment had a minor influence on corn transpiration.

Treatment
soil moisture environmente0
Outcome
Transpiratione0
Qualifier
in a minor waye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transpiration was found to be influenced in a minor way by plant population and soil moisture environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eliminating summer rainfall depressed corn yield in only one year.

Treatment
elimination of summer rainfalle0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
depressede0
Qualifier
only 1 yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were depressed in only 1 year by elimination of summer rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.