Paper · 1990 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

A comparison of the effects of single or multiple spring applications of prilled urea or ‘Nitro-chalk’ to winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

R. J. Darby; M. V. Hewitt

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY An earlier report of leaf scorch and diminished yield when using large amounts of urea on winter oilseed rape ( Brassica napus ) was investigated by applying 200 kg N/ha as calcium ammonium nitrate (‘Nitro-chalk’) or urea as a single dressing or divided in six ways. The ‘single-low’ variety Mikado (low in erucic acid) was grown in 1986 and was compared with the ‘double-low’ variety Ariana (low in erucic acid and glucosinolates) in 1987 and 1988. No scorch was seen in these experiments. Yield from rape fertilized with prilled urea was, on average, 98% of that from rape fertilized with ammonium nitrate. The timing and distribution of the fertilizer also had little effect on yield, though yield slightly decreased when part of the dressing was withheld during March. The earlier-maturing variety Mikado always outyielded Ariana except when harvest was delayed by bad weather. When plots were fertilized with urea, the oil content of the seed was a little larger than when fertilized with Nitro-chalk, which compensated for the smaller seed yield, resulting in almost equal oil yield from both forms of N fertilizer. Crude protein content was lower after a large single dose of urea fertilizer but parity with ammonium nitrate was restored by smaller amounts applied on a number of occasions. Neither form nor timing of N fertilizer had any consistent effect on the total glucosinolate content. The incidence of disease was significantly greater in rape given either form of N fertilizer than where none was given, but when downy mildew ( Peronospora parasitica ) was prevalent on pods there was significantly less infection in plots fertilized with urea than with ammonium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither fertilizer regimen produced visible scorch.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
No scorche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No scorch was seen in these experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prilled urea produced 98% of the seed yield from ammonium nitrate on average.

Treatment
prilled ureae0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
98% ofe0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield from rape fertilized with prilled urea was, on average, 98% of that from rape fertilized with ammonium nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer timing and distribution had little effect on yield.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
timing and distribution of the fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The timing and distribution of the fertilizer also had little effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding part of the dressing in March slightly reduced yield.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
part of the dressing was withheld during Marche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
slightly decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield slightly decreased when part of the dressing was withheld during March”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mikado usually outyielded Ariana, except when weather delayed harvest.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Material
Mikadoe0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Qualifier
except when harvest was delayed by bad weathere0
Comparator
Arianae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earlier-maturing variety Mikado always outyielded Ariana except when harvest was delayed by bad weather.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased seed oil content relative to Nitro-chalk.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
oil content of the seede0
Direction
a little largere0
Comparator
Nitro-chalke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plots were fertilized with urea, the oil content of the seed was a little larger than when fertilized with Nitro-chalk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil yield was almost equal under the two nitrogen fertilizer forms.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
both forms of N fertilizere0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
almost equale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in almost equal oil yield from both forms of N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large single urea dose lowered crude protein content relative to ammonium nitrate.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
a large single dose of urea fertilizere0
Outcome
Crude protein contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein content was lower after a large single dose of urea fertilizer but parity with ammonium nitrate was restored by smaller amounts applied on a number of occasions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated smaller urea doses restored crude protein parity with ammonium nitrate.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
smaller amounts applied on a number of occasionse0
Outcome
paritye0
Direction
restorede0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parity with ammonium nitrate was restored by smaller amounts applied on a number of occasions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen form and timing had no consistent effect on total glucosinolate content.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
form nor timing of N fertilizere0
Outcome
total glucosinolate contente0
Direction
any consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither form nor timing of N fertilizer had any consistent effect on the total glucosinolate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Either nitrogen fertilizer increased disease incidence relative to no fertilizer.

Treatment
either form of N fertilizere0
Outcome
incidence of diseasee0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Comparator
none was givene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of disease was significantly greater in rape given either form of N fertilizer than where none was given”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea reduced pod downy mildew infection relative to ammonium nitrate.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
ureae0
Interactor
Peronospora parasiticaHyaloperonospora parasiticae0pathogen
Outcome
downy mildew ( Peronospora parasitica ) was prevalent on pods there was significantly less infectione0
Direction
significantly lesse0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hyaloperonospora parasitica
Hyaloperonospora parasitica · InteractorEmmanuel Boutet · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when downy mildew ( Peronospora parasitica ) was prevalent on pods there was significantly less infection in plots fertilized with urea than with ammonium nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1695 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

fertilization · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.