Abstract
of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar to evaluate the effect of tree species and their spacing on yield of intercrop wheat (variety PBW-502) and soil properties. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with 3 replications. The highest grain yield (36.0 q ha -1 ) was obtained under open farming system (control). The reduction in grain yield was in the range of 16 to 62% under agroforestry systems as compared to control. Poplar based agri-silvicultural system performed better as compared to other systems. Highest wheat yield was recorded in 3.02.5 m 2 spacing under Poplar, Melia, and Leucaena based agri-silvicultural system but in the case of Eucalyptus, 3.02.0 m 2 spacing was the best. The organic carbon was highest under Poplar (1.73%) as compared to control (0.60%). The electrical conductivity was significantly lowered under Leucaena interfaces as compared to control. Whereas, soil pH was lowered under Poplar (at 3.02.0 m 2 ) and statistically similar with Leucaena (at 3.01.0 m 2 ). Bulk density was significantly decreased under Leucaena and Melia interfaces at 3.01.0 m 2 spacing. Highest available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O content (200.42, 18.67 and 169.12 kg ha -1 , respectively) were observed in the soil under Leucaena (3.02.0 m 2 ).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Open farming gave the highest wheat grain yield at 36.0 q ha -1.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 36.0 q ha -1e0
- Setting
- open farming systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest grain yield (36.0 q ha -1 ) was obtained under open farming system (control).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Agroforestry systems reduced wheat grain yield 16 to 62% versus open control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- agroforestry systemse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 16 to 62%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reduction in grain yield was in the range of 16 to 62% under agroforestry systems as compared to control.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Poplar agroforestry performed better than other systems for wheat yield.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Poplar based agri-silvicultural systeme0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Poplar based agri-silvicultural system performed better as compared to other systems.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3.02.5 m 2 spacing gave the highest wheat yield under Poplar, Melia, and Leucaena.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 3.02.5 m 2 spacinge0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest wheat yield was recorded in 3.02.5 m 2 spacing under Poplar, Melia, and Leucaena based agri-silvicultural system”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3.02.0 m 2 spacing gave the best wheat yield with Eucalyptus.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 3.02.0 m 2 spacinge0
- Outcome
- beste0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in the case of Eucalyptus, 3.02.0 m 2 spacing was the best.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil organic carbon under Poplar was 1.73% versus 0.60% in control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- organic carbone0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.73%e0
- Qualifier
- 0.60%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The organic carbon was highest under Poplar (1.73%) as compared to control (0.60%).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Leucaena significantly lowered soil electrical conductivity versus control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Leucaena interfacese0
- Outcome
- electrical conductivitye0
- Direction
- lowerede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The electrical conductivity was significantly lowered under Leucaena interfaces as compared to control.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Poplar at 3.02.0 m 2 lowered soil pH, statistically similar to Leucaena at 3.01.0 m 2.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Poplar (at 3.02.0 m 2 )e0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- lowerede0
- Comparator
- Leucaena (at 3.01.0 m 2 )e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil pH was lowered under Poplar (at 3.02.0 m 2 ) and statistically similar with Leucaena (at 3.01.0 m 2 ).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Leucaena at 3.01.0 m 2 significantly decreased bulk density.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Leucaenae0
- Outcome
- Bulk densitye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bulk density was significantly decreased under Leucaena and Melia interfaces at 3.01.0 m 2 spacing.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Melia at 3.01.0 m 2 significantly decreased bulk density.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Meliae0
- Outcome
- Bulk densitye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bulk density was significantly decreased under Leucaena and Melia interfaces at 3.01.0 m 2 spacing.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Available soil N was highest under Leucaena at 200.42 kg ha -1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- available Ne0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 200.42e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O content (200.42, 18.67 and 169.12 kg ha -1 , respectively) were observed in the soil under Leucaena (3.02.0 m 2 ).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Available soil P 2 O 5 was highest under Leucaena at 18.67 kg ha -1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- P 2 O 5e0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 18.67e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O content (200.42, 18.67 and 169.12 kg ha -1 , respectively) were observed in the soil under Leucaena (3.02.0 m 2 ).”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Available soil K 2 O was highest under Leucaena at 169.12 kg ha -1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- K 2 O contente0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 169.12 kg ha -1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O content (200.42, 18.67 and 169.12 kg ha -1 , respectively) were observed in the soil under Leucaena (3.02.0 m 2 ).”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.