Paper · 1988 · Agronomy Journal

Methods for Controlling pH in Hydroponic Culture of Winter Wheat Forage

S. C. Miyasaka; R. T. Checkai; D. L. Grunes; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plants grown in hydroponic culture make useful experimental models for soil‐grown plants. However, a major problem of nutrient solution culture is the adequate buffering of solution pH. Four methods of controlling pH in hydroponic culture of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. ‘Centurk’) were compared at two levels of Ca (0.2 and 2.0 m M ) to determine the buffering method with the least effect on the uptake of essential nutrient elements. These methods were: (i) manual titration with NaOH; (ii) Amberlite DP‐1 weakly acidic cation exchange resin loaded with Ca, Mg, K, and H; (iii) the organic buffer, 2‐(N‐morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), at 1m M ; and (iv) MES a t 5 m M . Five‐millimolar MES gave the most consistent control of solution pH. However, it also inhibited Zn accumulation by wheat. One‐millimolar MES did not maintain the solution pH as well as 5 m M MES, but it did not significantly alter the uptake of any essential nutrient element. It is recommended as a pH buffer for the hydroponic culture of winter wheat. Resin in membrane bags did not adequately buffer the solution pH. It also removed some Mn and Zn from solution, thus depressing their uptake by wheat. Resin in a pump system adequately buffered the solution pH until its effectiveness was limited by the flow rate through the resin bed. Adequate buffering of solution pH was found to be critical for experiments that study the interactions between Ca and other nutrient elements. With the pH buffer, MES, the previously reported effects of Ca on depressing Mg, Mn, and Zn accumulation were observed. However, in the poorly buffered treatments, these elements tended to increase slightly with increasing Ca levels, perhaps due to the effect of Ca on maintaining root membrane integrity in an acidic environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five millimolar MES controlled solution pH most consistently.

Outcome
control of solution pHe0
Value
Five‐millimolare0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Five‐millimolar MES gave the most consistent control of solution pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five millimolar MES inhibited wheat zinc accumulation.

Outcome
Zn accumulation by wheate0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, it also inhibited Zn accumulation by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–816 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One millimolar MES buffered solution pH less well than five millimolar MES.

Outcome
solution pHe0
Value
One‐millimolare0
Comparator
5 m M MESe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“One‐millimolar MES did not maintain the solution pH as well as 5 m M MES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One millimolar MES did not significantly alter essential nutrient uptake.

Outcome
uptake of any essential nutrient elemente0
Direction
did not significantly altere0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it did not significantly alter the uptake of any essential nutrient element.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–971 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resin in membrane bags did not adequately buffer solution pH.

Outcome
buffer the solution pHe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Resin in membrane bags did not adequately buffer the solution pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Membrane bag resin depressed wheat Mn and Zn uptake after removing these elements from solution.

Outcome
their uptake by wheate0
Direction
depressinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also removed some Mn and Zn from solution, thus depressing their uptake by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1199 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pump system resin buffered pH adequately until flow rate limited effectiveness.

Outcome
buffered the solution pHe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Resin in a pump system adequately buffered the solution pH until its effectiveness was limited by the flow rate through the resin bed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With MES buffering, calcium depressed Mg, Mn and Zn accumulation.

Treatment
Cae0
Outcome
Mg, Mn, and Zn accumulatione0
Direction
depressinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With the pH buffer, MES, the previously reported effects of Ca on depressing Mg, Mn, and Zn accumulation were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under poor buffering, these nutrient levels tended to rise slightly with calcium.

Treatment
increasing Ca levelse0
Outcome
these elementse0
Direction
increase slightlye0
Qualifier
poorly buffered treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in the poorly buffered treatments, these elements tended to increase slightly with increasing Ca levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1710 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.