Paper · 2004 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Plant Competition Effects on the Nitrogen Economy of Field Pea and the Subsequent Crop

Y. K. Soon; K. N. Harker; G. W. Clayton

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We evaluated weed competition effects on the N economy of field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) and the subsequent crop to address the paucity of such information. Plots were seeded to pea, canola ( Brassica napus L.) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) in 1997 and 1998. Weeds, augmented by cross‐seeding experimental plots with oat (Avena sativa L.), were removed with herbicides one and four weeks after crop emergence (WAE). The subsequent barley crop received 0 or 6 g N m −2 Mean percentage of N derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) for the 2 yr, estimated by 15 N isotopic dilution, was 81% for the 4‐WAE treatment and 51% for the 1‐WAE treatment, indicating that a pea plant subjected to greater weed competition derived more of its N from symbiotic fixation. Total N fixed by pea was not affected by the time of weed removal, however, and total N uptake and seed yield were greater with early weed removal due to less competition for soil N. Early weed removal resulted in net N export in pea seeds (because of higher production) while later weed removal resulted in gains of 1.1 to 1.3 g N m −2 However, time of weed removal during pea cultivation had no effect on the yield or N uptake of the subsequent barley crop. Higher barley yield and N uptake following pea than following barley were mostly the result of greater N availability. Nitrogen fertilization benefited the subsequent barley regardless of preceding crop type.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later weed removal increased the share of pea nitrogen derived from fixation from 51% to 81%.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
4‐WAE treatmente0
Outcome
percentage of N derived from the atmospheree0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
81%e0
Qualifier
51%e0
Comparator
1‐WAE treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Mean percentage of N derived from the atmosphere (%Ndfa) for the 2 yr, estimated by 15 N isotopic dilution, was 81% for the 4‐WAE treatment and 51% for the 1‐WAE treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen fixed by pea was unaffected by weed removal timing.

Treatment
time of weed removale0
Outcome
Total N fixede0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N fixed by pea was not affected by the time of weed removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early weed removal increased total nitrogen uptake in pea.

Treatment
early weed removale0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total N uptake and seed yield were greater with early weed removal due to less competition for soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early weed removal increased pea seed yield.

Treatment
early weed removale0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total N uptake and seed yield were greater with early weed removal due to less competition for soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early weed removal caused net nitrogen export in pea seeds.

Treatment
Early weed removale0
Outcome
net N export in pea seedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early weed removal resulted in net N export in pea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later weed removal produced a nitrogen gain of 1.1 to 1.3 g N m −2.

Treatment
later weed removale0
Outcome
gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
1.1 to 1.3 g N m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“later weed removal resulted in gains of 1.1 to 1.3 g N m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea weed removal timing did not affect yield of the subsequent barley crop.

Treatment
time of weed removal during pea cultivatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time of weed removal during pea cultivation had no effect on the yield or N uptake of the subsequent barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea weed removal timing did not affect nitrogen uptake of the subsequent barley crop.

Treatment
time of weed removal during pea cultivatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time of weed removal during pea cultivation had no effect on the yield or N uptake of the subsequent barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1214 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield was higher after pea than after barley.

Treatment
following peae0
Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
following barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher barley yield and N uptake following pea than following barley were mostly the result of greater N availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley nitrogen uptake was higher after pea than after barley.

Treatment
following peae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
following barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher barley yield and N uptake following pea than following barley were mostly the result of greater N availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer benefited subsequent barley regardless of preceding crop.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
subsequent barleye0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization benefited the subsequent barley regardless of preceding crop type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1423 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.