Paper · 1990 · Crop Science

Salinity Stress and Varietal Resistance in Rice: Effects on Whitebacked Planthopper

M. Salim; R. C. Saxena; M. Akbar

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants grown under physicochemical stresses frequently become more susceptible to insects. We determined the effects of salinity stress at 1.0 and 1.2 S/m electrical conductivity on the magnitude and expression of resistance of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars to Sogatella furcifera (Horváth) under glasshouse conditions using natural daylight of 12 h, 29/21 °C (day/night), and minimum 70% relative humidity. Salinity stress increased N, decreased K, and decreased the quantity of allelochemicals extracted as steam distillates from rice plants. Intake and assimilation of food, growth, adult longevity, fecundity, and population increase of the insect were significantly greater on plants grown at salinity level of 1.2 S/m than on unstressed control plants. Regardless of the level of stress, the difference between susceptibility of ‘Taichung Native 1’ (TN1) and resistance of ‘IR2035‐117‐3’ (IR2035) cultivars remained distinct. Painting of steam‐distillate extract of resistant IR2035 plants on susceptible TN1 plants made them less attractive and decreased food intake and assimilation by S. furcifera . In contrast, intake and assimilation of food increased significantly on IR2035 plants painted with TN1 extract. Effects of Physicochemical stresses, such as salinity, must be considered when breeding insect‐resistant rice cultivars for salinity‐prone areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased rice nitrogen content.

Treatment
Salinity stresse0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress increased N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased rice potassium content.

Treatment
Salinity stresse1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity stress increased N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased the quantity of steam distillate allelochemicals in rice.

Treatment
Salinity Stresst0
Outcome
quantity of allelochemicalse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the quantity of allelochemicals extracted as steam distillates from rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper food intake and assimilation were greater on rice at 1.2 S/m salinity than controls.

Treatment
salinity level of 1.2 S/me0
Outcome
Intake and assimilation of foode0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
unstressed control plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intake and assimilation of food, growth, adult longevity, fecundity, and population increase of the insect were significantly greater on plants grown at salinity level of 1.2 S/m than on unstressed control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper growth, longevity and fecundity were greater on rice at 1.2 S/m salinity.

Treatment
salinity level of 1.2 S/me0
Outcome
growth, adult longevity, fecunditye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
unstressed control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth, adult longevity, fecundity, and population increase of the insect were significantly greater on plants grown at salinity level of 1.2 S/m than on unstressed control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper population increase was greater on salinity stressed rice.

Treatment
salinity level of 1.2 S/me0
Outcome
population increase of the insecte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
unstressed control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population increase of the insect were significantly greater on plants grown at salinity level of 1.2 S/m than on unstressed control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TN1 remained susceptible and IR2035 resistant regardless of stress.

Material
‘Taichung Native 1’ (TN1)e0
Outcome
difference between susceptibilitye0
Comparator
‘IR2035‐117‐3’ (IR2035)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the level of stress, the difference between susceptibility of ‘Taichung Native 1’ (TN1) and resistance of ‘IR2035‐117‐3’ (IR2035) cultivars remained distinct”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR2035 extract made TN1 plants less attractive to planthoppers.

Material
TN1e0
Treatment
steam‐distillate extract of resistant IR2035 plantse0
Outcome
less attractivee0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Painting of steam‐distillate extract of resistant IR2035 plants on susceptible TN1 plants made them less attractive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR2035 extract decreased planthopper intake and assimilation on TN1.

Interactor
S. furciferaSogatella furciferae0pest
Outcome
food intake and assimilation by S. furciferae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased food intake and assimilation by S. furcifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TN1 extract increased planthopper food intake and assimilation on IR2035.

Material
IR2035e0
Treatment
TN1 extracte0
Outcome
intake and assimilation of foode0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intake and assimilation of food increased significantly on IR2035 plants painted with TN1 extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend accounting for salinity when breeding planthopper resistant rice for saline areas.

Outcome
considered when breeding insect‐resistant rice cultivars for salinity‐prone arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of Physicochemical stresses, such as salinity, must be considered when breeding insect‐resistant rice cultivars for salinity‐prone areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–47 · show in text ↑

salinity · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 8 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 24 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.