Paper · 2011 · Environmental Science & Technology

Biochemical Suitability of Crop Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol: Disincentives to Nitrogen Fertilization in Corn Agriculture

Morgan E. Gallagher; William C. Hockaday; Caroline A. Masiello; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Concerns about energy security and climate change have increased biofuel demand, particularly ethanol produced from cellulosic feedstocks (e.g., food crop residues). A central challenge to cropping for cellulosic ethanol is the potential environmental damage from increased fertilizer use. Previous analyses have assumed that cropping for carbohydrate in residue will require the same amount of fertilizer as cropping for grain. Using (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance, we show that increases in biomass in response to fertilization are not uniform across biochemical classes (carbohydrate, protein, lipid, lignin) or tissues (leaf and stem, grain, reproductive support). Although corn grain responds vigorously and nonlinearly, corn residue shows only modest increases in carbohydrate yields in response to high levels of fertilization (25% increase with 202 kg N ha(-1)). Lignin yields in the residue increased almost twice as much as carbohydrate yields in response to nitrogen, implying that residue feedstock quality declines as more fertilizer is applied. Fertilization also increases the decomposability of corn residue, implying that soil carbon sequestration becomes less efficient with increased fertilizer. Our results suggest that even when corn is grown for grain, benefits of fertilization decline rapidly after the ecosystem's N demands are met. Heavy application of fertilizer yields minimal grain benefits and almost no benefits in residue carbohydrates, while degrading the cellulosic ethanol feedstock quality and soil carbon sequestration capacity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass responses to fertilization differed across biochemical classes and tissues.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
increases in biomasse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in biomass in response to fertilization are not uniform across biochemical classes (carbohydrate, protein, lipid, lignin) or tissues (leaf and stem, grain, reproductive support)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain responded vigorously and nonlinearly to fertilization.

Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
corn graine0
Direction
vigorouslye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn grain responds vigorously and nonlinearly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“in response to fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn residue carbohydrate yield increased 25% at 202 kg N ha(-1).

Treatment
202 kg N ha(-1)e0
Outcome
carbohydrate yieldse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn residue shows only modest increases in carbohydrate yields in response to high levels of fertilization (25% increase with 202 kg N ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue lignin yield increased almost twice as much as carbohydrate yield with nitrogen.

Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
Lignin yields in the residuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost twice as muche0
Comparator
carbohydrate yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lignin yields in the residue increased almost twice as much as carbohydrate yields in response to nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although corn grain responds vigorously and nonlinearly, corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased corn residue decomposability.

Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
decomposability of corn residuee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization also increases the decomposability of corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude fertilization benefits decline after ecosystem nitrogen demand is met.

Outcome
benefits of fertilization decline rapidlye0
Qualifier
after the ecosystem's N demands are mete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefits of fertilization decline rapidly after the ecosystem's N demands are met”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn is grown for grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1275 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy fertilizer gives minimal grain benefit and almost no residue carbohydrate benefit while degrading feedstock quality and soil carbon capacity.

Outcome
minimal grain benefits and almost no benefits in residue carbohydratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heavy application of fertilizer yields minimal grain benefits and almost no benefits in residue carbohydrates, while degrading the cellulosic ethanol feedstock quality and soil carbon sequestration capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1566 · show in text ↑
e1

“even when corn is grown for grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1275 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 33 positive, 10 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.