Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Drought-tolerant plant growth promotingBacillusspp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress

Sandhya Vardharajula; Shaik Zulfikar Ali; Minakshi Grover; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
612
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In present study Bacillus spp. screened for drought tolerance could tolerate minimal water potential (-0.73 MPa) were evaluated for plant growth promoting properties at –0.73 MPa. Drought stress affected growth of isolates as indicated by increased intracellular free amino acids, proline, total soluble sugars, and exopolysaccharides. Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp. HYD-B17, HYTAPB18, HYDGRFB19, BKB30, RMPB44 identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Paenibacillus favisporus, Bacillus subtilis based on 16S rDNA gene sequence were used to study the effect of inoculation on growth, osmolytes, antioxidant status. Inoculation increased plant biomass, relative water content, leaf water potential, root adhering soil/root tissue ratio, aggregate stability, decreasing leaf water loss. Bacillus spp. effect on osmoregulation increased proline, sugars, free amino acids and decreased electrolyte leakage. Inoculation reduced the activity of antioxidant enzymes ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase. As a result, Bacillus spp. inoculated maize seedlings showed physiological response that could alleviate drought stress negative effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased intracellular free amino acids, proline and total soluble sugars in the Bacillus isolates.

Taxon
Bacillus spp.e0
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
intracellular free amino acids, proline, total soluble sugarse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress affected growth of isolates as indicated by increased intracellular free amino acids, proline, total soluble sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased exopolysaccharides in the Bacillus isolates.

Taxon
Bacillus spp.e0
Treatment
Drought stresse1
Outcome
exopolysaccharidese1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress affected growth of isolates as indicated by increased intracellular free amino acids, proline, total soluble sugars, and exopolysaccharides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Bacillus spp. increased plant biomass, relative water content and leaf water potential of maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculatione1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomass, relative water content, leaf water potentiale1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation increased plant biomass, relative water content, leaf water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Bacillus spp. increased the root adhering soil/root tissue ratio and aggregate stability in maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculatione1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
root adhering soil/root tissue ratio, aggregate stabilitye1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation increased plant biomass, relative water content, leaf water potential, root adhering soil/root tissue ratio, aggregate stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Bacillus spp. decreased leaf water loss in maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculatione1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
leaf water losse2
Direction
decreasinge2
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation increased plant biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–699 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreasing leaf water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus spp. increased proline, sugars and free amino acids through an effect on osmoregulation in maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bacillus spp.e0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
proline, sugars, free amino acidse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus spp. effect on osmoregulation increased proline, sugars, free amino acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus spp. decreased electrolyte leakage in maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Bacillus spp.e0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus spp. effect on osmoregulation increased proline, sugars, free amino acids and decreased electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced the activity of the antioxidant enzymes ascorbate peroxidase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in maize under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Inoculatione1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidasee1
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymese1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
drought stresst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought-tolerant Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculation reduced the activity of antioxidant enzymes ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1062 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that Bacillus-inoculated maize seedlings showed a physiological response that could alleviate the negative effects of drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Bacillus spp. inoculatede0
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
drought stress negative effectse0
Qualifier
physiological responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus spp. inoculated maize seedlings showed physiological response that could alleviate drought stress negative effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1200 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.