Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

ROOT EXUDATION AND ZINC UPTAKE BY BARLEY GENOTYPES DIFFERING IN ZN EFFICIENCY

MirHasan Rasouli-Sadaghiani; Behzad Sadeghzadeh; Ebrahim Sepehr; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two barley cultivars (‘Sahara’ = Zn-efficient and ‘Clipper’ = Zn-inefficient) were grown at different soil Zn fertilization (0, 0.2, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg Zn kg−1 soil). Root exudates were collected 16 and 28 days after sowing. At Zn = 0, shoot dry matter was decreased in both genotypes, but more distinctly in ‘Clipper’. At 0.2 mg Zn kg−1, the ‘Sahara’ shoot concentrations of Zn was 130% higher and shoot Zn content 44% greater compared with ‘Clipper’. Low-molecular-weight organic acid anions (=carboxylates) (malate, maleate, fumarate and cis-aconitate) and amino acids (alanine, valine, proline, aspartic acid and glutamic acid) were detected in root exudates, with the highest concentration at Zn = 0.2 mg kg−1 soil. Higher concentrations of organic acid anions as well as amino acids were noted in the rhizosphere of ‘Sahara’ than ‘Clipper’. The genotypic differences in Zn acquisition from soil may be linked to differential carboxylate and amino acid composition of root exudates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero zinc reduced shoot dry matter in both cultivars, more strongly in Clipper.

Material
‘Clipper’e0
Treatment
Zn = 0e0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Zn = 0, shoot dry matter was decreased in both genotypes, but more distinctly in ‘Clipper’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–320 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 mg Zn kg−1, Sahara shoot Zn concentration was 130% higher than Clipper.

Material
‘Sahara’e0
Treatment
0.2 mg Zn kg−1e0
Outcome
shoot concentrations of Zne0
Direction
highere0
Value
130%e0
Comparator
‘Clipper’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 0.2 mg Zn kg−1, the ‘Sahara’ shoot concentrations of Zn was 130% higher and shoot Zn content 44% greater compared with ‘Clipper’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2 mg Zn kg−1, Sahara shoot Zn content was 44% greater than Clipper.

Material
‘Sahara’e0
Treatment
0.2 mg Zn kg−1e0
Outcome
shoot Zn contente0
Direction
greatere0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
‘Clipper’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 0.2 mg Zn kg−1, the ‘Sahara’ shoot concentrations of Zn was 130% higher and shoot Zn content 44% greater compared with ‘Clipper’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–453 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxylates were detected in barley root exudates.

Organ / stage
root exudatese0
Outcome
malate, maleate, fumarate and cis-aconitatee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low-molecular-weight organic acid anions (=carboxylates) (malate, maleate, fumarate and cis-aconitate) and amino acids (alanine, valine, proline, aspartic acid and glutamic acid) were detected in root exudates, with the highest concentration at Zn = 0.2 mg kg−1 soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acids were detected in barley root exudates.

Organ / stage
root exudatese0
Outcome
alanine, valine, proline, aspartic acid and glutamic acide0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amino acids (alanine, valine, proline, aspartic acid and glutamic acid) were detected in root exudates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root exudate concentration was highest at 0.2 mg Zn kg−1 soil.

Treatment
Zn = 0.2 mg kg−1 soile0
Outcome
concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the highest concentration at Zn = 0.2 mg kg−1 soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sahara had higher organic acid anion and amino acid concentrations in its rhizosphere than Clipper.

Material
‘Sahara’e0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Outcome
concentrations of organic acid anions as well as amino acidse0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
‘Clipper’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher concentrations of organic acid anions as well as amino acids were noted in the rhizosphere of ‘Sahara’ than ‘Clipper’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic differences in zinc acquisition may be linked to carboxylate and amino acid composition of root exudates.

Organ / stage
root exudatese0
Outcome
Zn acquisition from soile0
Qualifier
differential carboxylate and amino acid compositione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypic differences in Zn acquisition from soil may be linked to differential carboxylate and amino acid composition of root exudates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“BARLEY GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

43 papers: 25 positive, 18 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.