Paper · 1999 · Annals of Applied Biology

Water and temperature relations of softrot bacteria: growth and disease development

B M SCHOBER; J C ZADOKS

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary The effect of water availability and the temperature of the growth substrate on growth and disease development of softrot bacteria were studied using artificial media and plant material. Water availability was measured as the osmotic potential of a solution (ψ osm ) and was assessed for solutions of PEG4000 and KNO 3 as artificial osmotica and for plant tissue of chicory heads. Growth of softrot bacteria was found at water potentials from ψ= ‐0.12 MPa to ψ= ‐8.0 MPa but the lag phase of the growth curve increased with decreasing water potential. The relative growth rates of the three softrot pathogens showed a sigmoidal relationship with water potential, the relative growth rates decreasing rapidly at water potentials lower than ψ= ‐1.5 MPa. The water potential of harvested chicory heads decreased with storage time of the harvested crop but was still within the growth limits for softrot bacteria. In relation to temperature, the relative growth rate of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (Ecc) was highest at 10°C, of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (Eca) at 15°C and of Pseudomonas marginalis (Pm) at 5°C. Chicory heads of two cultivars, Rumba and Salsa, inoculated with Ecc , had a significantly higher disease severity at 30°C (0.72 for Rumba and 0.47 for Salsa) than at lower or higher temperatures. In conclusion, temperature and water availability during forcing of chicory were not factors limiting populations of softrot bacteria. Possibilities for crop protection thus only avail during chicory root storage. During storage a high death rate combined with a low growth rate of the softrot bacteria may result in a decrease of bacterial populations below the minimum densities needed for infection during the forcing of chicory heads.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Softrot bacterial growth occurred across water potentials of −0.12 to −8.0 MPa.

Interactor
softrot bacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
Growth of softrot bacteriae0
Value
ψ= ‐0.12 MPa to ψ= ‐8.0 MPae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of softrot bacteria was found at water potentials from ψ= ‐0.12 MPa to ψ= ‐8.0 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–478 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial growth lag increased as water potential decreased.

Outcome
lag phase of the growth curvee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
decreasing water potentiale0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“the lag phase of the growth curve increased with decreasing water potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–559 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rates of three softrot pathogens dropped rapidly below −1.5 MPa.

Outcome
relative growth ratese0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
ψ= ‐1.5 MPae0
Setting
water potentialse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the relative growth rates decreasing rapidly at water potentials lower than ψ= ‐1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvested chicory head water potential decreased during storage but remained within softrot bacterial growth limits.

Interactor
softrot bacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water potential of harvested chicory heads decreased with storage time of the harvested crop but was still within the growth limits for softrot bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecc had its highest relative growth rate at 10°C.

Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovoraPectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorume0pathogen
Outcome
relative growth rate of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovorae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10°Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative growth rate of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (Ecc) was highest at 10°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eca had its highest relative growth rate at 15°C.

Interactor
Erwinia carotovora subsp. atrosepticaPectobacterium atrosepticume0pathogen
Outcome
Erwinia carotovora subsp. atrosepticae0
Value
15°Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectobacterium atrosepticum
Pectobacterium atrosepticum · InteractorAmy Charkowski · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (Eca) at 15°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pm had its highest relative growth rate at 5°C.

Interactor
Pseudomonas marginalisPseudomonas marginalise0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudomonas marginalise0
Value
5°Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas marginalis
Pseudomonas marginalis · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“of Pseudomonas marginalis (Pm) at 5°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecc-inoculated Rumba chicory had significantly higher disease severity at 30°C than other temperatures.

Material
Rumbae0
Treatment
inoculated with Ecce0
Interactor
Ecce0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.72e0
Comparator
lower or higher temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chicory heads of two cultivars, Rumba and Salsa, inoculated with Ecc , had a significantly higher disease severity at 30°C (0.72 for Rumba and 0.47 for Salsa) than at lower or higher temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecc-inoculated Salsa chicory had significantly higher disease severity at 30°C than other temperatures.

Material
Salsae0
Treatment
inoculated with Ecce0
Interactor
Ecce0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.47e0
Comparator
lower or higher temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chicory heads of two cultivars, Rumba and Salsa, inoculated with Ecc , had a significantly higher disease severity at 30°C (0.72 for Rumba and 0.47 for Salsa) than at lower or higher temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1332 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and water during chicory forcing did not limit softrot bacterial populations.

Interactor
softrot bacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
populations of softrot bacteriae0
Direction
not factors limitinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature and water availability during forcing of chicory were not factors limiting populations of softrot bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1467 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crop protection opportunities were confined to chicory root storage.

Organ / stage
root storagee0
Outcome
crop protectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Possibilities for crop protection thus only avail during chicory root storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1546 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High bacterial death and low growth during storage may bring populations below infection density.

Interactor
softrot bacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
bacterial populationse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
high death rate combined with a low growth ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During storage a high death rate combined with a low growth rate of the softrot bacteria may result in a decrease of bacterial populations below the minimum densities needed for infection during the forcing of chicory heads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1771 · show in text ↑