Paper · 2011 · Crop and Pasture Science

The application of n-butanol improves embryo and green plant production in anther culture of Australian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes

Sue Broughton

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to improve the production from anther culture of embryos and green plants in Australian spring wheat genotypes by testing new treatments such as n-butanol, as well as other protocol modifications. To date, the use of n-butanol to enhance embryogenesis has only been tested in two European wheat cultivars; this is the first study which demonstrates its application across a range of breeding crosses. A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanol following anther pretreatment on a solid mannitol medium significantly improved the production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploids in a range of Australian wheat crosses and varieties. Green plant production increased between 3- and 6-fold in the crosses Yitpi/2*Bumper, Tammarin Rock/2*Bumper and Tammarin Rock/2*Magenta. The addition of calcium (Ca) and macronutrients to the mannitol pretreatment medium also significantly improved the number of embryos and green plants in varieties and crosses, but only when used in combination with n-butanol treatment. A factorial experiment with four varieties and two treatments (n-butanol and Ca/macronutrients) revealed significant interactions between treatments and genotype. In three of the four varieties, the application of n-butanol resulted in significant increases in embryos and green plants with either pretreatment medium although the best results were obtained with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium, with 200, 193 and 52 green plants per 100 anthers obtained for Bumper, Gladius and Magenta, respectively. In the variety Fortune however, n-butanol treatment did not improve embryo or green plant production unless it was combined with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium and then there were dramatic improvements; from 0 to 27 green plants per 100 anthers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5-h n-butanol treatment significantly improved embryo, green plant and doubled haploid production in Australian wheat crosses and varieties

Material
Australian wheat crosses and varietiese2
Treatment
A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanole2
Outcome
production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploidse2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanol following anther pretreatment on a solid mannitol medium significantly improved the production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploids in a range of Australian wheat crosses and varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green plant production increased 3- to 6-fold in the cross Yitpi/2*Bumper

Material
Yitpi/2*Bumpere3
Treatment
A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanole2
Outcome
Green plant productione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
between 3- and 6-folde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanol following anther pretreatment on a solid mannitol medium significantly improved the production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploids in a range of Australian wheat crosses and varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“Green plant production increased between 3- and 6-fold in the crosses Yitpi/2*Bumper, Tammarin Rock/2*Bumper and Tammarin Rock/2*Magenta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green plant production increased 3- to 6-fold in the cross Tammarin Rock/2*Bumper

Material
Tammarin Rock/2*Bumpere3
Treatment
A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanole2
Outcome
Green plant productione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
between 3- and 6-folde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanol following anther pretreatment on a solid mannitol medium significantly improved the production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploids in a range of Australian wheat crosses and varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“Green plant production increased between 3- and 6-fold in the crosses Yitpi/2*Bumper, Tammarin Rock/2*Bumper and Tammarin Rock/2*Magenta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green plant production increased 3- to 6-fold in the cross Tammarin Rock/2*Magenta

Material
Tammarin Rock/2*Magentae3
Treatment
A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanole2
Outcome
Green plant productione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
between 3- and 6-folde3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 5-h treatment using 0.1 or 0.2% (v/v) n-butanol following anther pretreatment on a solid mannitol medium significantly improved the production of embryos, green plants and doubled haploids in a range of Australian wheat crosses and varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“Green plant production increased between 3- and 6-fold in the crosses Yitpi/2*Bumper, Tammarin Rock/2*Bumper and Tammarin Rock/2*Magenta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium and macronutrients added to the mannitol pretreatment significantly improved embryo and green plant numbers, but only together with n-butanol

Treatment
The addition of calcium (Ca) and macronutrients to the mannitol pretreatment mediume2
Outcome
the number of embryos and green plantse2
Direction
improvede2
Qualifier
only when used in combination with n-butanol treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of calcium (Ca) and macronutrients to the mannitol pretreatment medium also significantly improved the number of embryos and green plants in varieties and crosses, but only when used in combination with n-butanol treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Factorial experiment with four varieties showed significant interactions between n-butanol/Ca-macronutrient treatments and genotype

Material
four varietiese2
Treatment
n-butanol and Ca/macronutrientse2
Outcome
significant interactions between treatments and genotypee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“A factorial experiment with four varieties and two treatments (n-butanol and Ca/macronutrients) revealed significant interactions between treatments and genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In three of four varieties, n-butanol increased embryo and green plant numbers with either pretreatment medium

Material
three of the four varietiese2
Treatment
the application of n-butanole2
Outcome
embryos and green plantse2
Direction
increasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“In three of the four varieties, the application of n-butanol resulted in significant increases in embryos and green plants with either pretreatment medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bumper gave 200 green plants per 100 anthers with the best pretreatment (Ca and macronutrients)

Material
Bumpere2
Treatment
Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment mediume2
Outcome
green plants per 100 antherse2
Value
200e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“although the best results were obtained with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium, with 200, 193 and 52 green plants per 100 anthers obtained for Bumper, Gladius and Magenta, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gladius gave 193 green plants per 100 anthers with the best pretreatment (Ca and macronutrients)

Material
Gladiuse2
Treatment
Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment mediume2
Outcome
green plants per 100 antherse2
Value
193e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“although the best results were obtained with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium, with 200, 193 and 52 green plants per 100 anthers obtained for Bumper, Gladius and Magenta, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magenta gave 52 green plants per 100 anthers with the best pretreatment (Ca and macronutrients)

Material
Magentae2
Treatment
Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment mediume2
Outcome
green plants per 100 antherse2
Value
52e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“although the best results were obtained with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium, with 200, 193 and 52 green plants per 100 anthers obtained for Bumper, Gladius and Magenta, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In variety Fortune, n-butanol alone did not improve embryo or green plant production

Material
Fortunee2
Treatment
n-butanol treatmente2
Outcome
embryo or green plant productione2
Direction
did not improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the variety Fortune however, n-butanol treatment did not improve embryo or green plant production unless it was combined with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In variety Fortune, n-butanol combined with Ca and macronutrients gave dramatic improvements, from 0 to 27 green plants per 100 anthers

Material
Fortunee2
Treatment
combined with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment mediume3
Outcome
green plants per 100 antherse3
Direction
improvementse3
Value
from 0 to 27e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in Australian spring wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the variety Fortune however, n-butanol treatment did not improve embryo or green plant production unless it was combined with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1749 · show in text ↑
e3

“combined with Ca and macronutrients in the pretreatment medium and then there were dramatic improvements; from 0 to 27 green plants per 100 anthers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1834 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mannitol · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 36 positive, 18 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.