Paper · 1987 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Rapid Phytochrome Regulation of Wheat Seedling Extension

Harry Smith; G. Michael Jackson

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rapid effects of light on wheat seedling extension growth were monitored by sensitive transducer techniques. Seedlings grown in complete darkness responded to light by a marked deceleration of extension growth after a mean latent period of 10.4 minutes. Pulses (5 minutes) of red (660 nanometers), green (530 nanometers), and far-red (730 nanometers) light caused marked extension rate depression, and the red effect could not be reversed by 730 nanometers far-red. Pulses of 1 second red (72 micromoles per square meter) were effective, and were reversible by immediate long wavelength (759 nanometers) far-red. Seedlings pretreated with 2 minute broadband green light (0.6 micromole per square meter), 28 hours prior to the experimental light treatments, displayed similar extension rate decelerations in response to red light, but after a longer mean lag of 23.75 minutes. No response was observed with red light treatments of less than 1 minute, and the effects of 5 minutes of red light were fully reversible by 5 minutes of 730 nanometers far-red. Fluence-response curves showed that nonpretreated seedlings were approximately 100 times more sensitive to far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome than were those given prior light treatment. Although the fluence-response relationship for nonpretreated seedlings matched the photoconversion kinetics of phytochrome reasonably well, that for the pretreated seedlings indicated a requirement for repeated photoconversions for maximum action. The results are discussed in relation to the possibility that phytochrome may regulate the availability, or the activity, of a component of its own transduction chain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-grown wheat seedlings decelerated extension growth after light exposure, with a mean latency of 10.4 minutes.

Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
extension growthe0
Direction
deceleratione0
Value
10.4 minutese0
Comparator
complete darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings grown in complete darkness responded to light by a marked deceleration of extension growth after a mean latent period of 10.4 minutes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-minute red, green and far-red pulses depressed extension rate.

Treatment
Pulses (5 minutes) of red (660 nanometers), green (530 nanometers), and far-red (730 nanometers) lighte0
Outcome
extension ratee0
Direction
depressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pulses (5 minutes) of red (660 nanometers), green (530 nanometers), and far-red (730 nanometers) light caused marked extension rate depression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The five-minute red-light effect was not reversed by 730-nanometer far-red light.

Outcome
red effect could not be reversed by 730 nanometers far-rede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the red effect could not be reversed by 730 nanometers far-red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-second red pulses were effective and immediately reversible by 759-nanometer far-red light.

Outcome
were effective, and were reversible by immediate long wavelength (759 nanometers) far-rede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pulses of 1 second red (72 micromoles per square meter) were effective, and were reversible by immediate long wavelength (759 nanometers) far-red.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-pretreated seedlings showed red-light-induced deceleration after a longer mean lag of 23.75 minutes.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
extension ratee0
Direction
decelerationse0
Value
23.75 minutese0
Qualifier
pretreated with 2 minute broadband green light (0.6 micromole per square meter), 28 hours priore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings pretreated with 2 minute broadband green light (0.6 micromole per square meter), 28 hours prior to the experimental light treatments, displayed similar extension rate decelerations in response to red light, but after a longer mean lag of 23.75 minutes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-pretreated seedlings showed no response to red light for less than one minute.

Treatment
red light treatments of less than 1 minutee0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
No responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No response was observed with red light treatments of less than 1 minute”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In green-pretreated seedlings, five minutes of red light was fully reversible by five minutes of 730-nanometer far-red.

Outcome
effects of 5 minutes of red light were fully reversible by 5 minutes of 730 nanometers far-rede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of 5 minutes of red light were fully reversible by 5 minutes of 730 nanometers far-red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpretreated seedlings were approximately 100 times more sensitive to the far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome than pretreated seedlings.

Outcome
sensitive to far-red-absorbing form of phytochromee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Value
approximately 100 timese0
Comparator
those given prior light treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nonpretreated seedlings were approximately 100 times more sensitive to far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome than were those given prior light treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.