Paper · 1984 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Acidification, growth promoter, and red light effects on germination of skotodormant lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)

Andrew I. Hsiao; William Vidaver; William A. Quick

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Increasing the period of dark storage (DS) within a uniform seed lot of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Grand Rapids) increased the degree of secondary dormancy (skotodormancy) induced, as evidenced by a loss of sensitivity to red light (R) and growth promoters such as gibberellin A 3 (GA 3 ), kinetin, thiourea, and ethylene. Differential degrees of skotodormancy were induced in lettuce seeds from three different sources (lot I < lot II < lot III). Either R or GA 3 significantly increased the germination of skotodormant seeds if seeds were first immersed in strongly acidic solutions (pH ≤ 3.0) and then rinsed with water. The critical factor was found to be pH, not ionic strength. Promotion of germination by R or GA 3 was positively related to increasing acidity, and also to the duration of DS. Sensitivity of the germination response to acid immersion varied with the seed lots, as little as 1 s being effective with some seeds. Acid treatment thus enables skotodormant seeds to recover much of their responsiveness to R and GA 3 . Extended DS (21 days) produced such pronounced skotodormancy (seed lot III) that acid immersion followed by usual R and GA 3 produced only 10% germination. Continuous R or a seed-piercing treatment produced complete germination in otherwise skotodormant seeds. Responsiveness of germination to thiourea, kinetin, and ethylene, however, was not regained by treatment with acid. The action of these three chemicals on skotodormant seeds thus seems to be dependent on an active phytochrome and GA 3 -sensitive system. Acid-immersion treatments appear primarily to weaken membrane barriers of the endosperm cells, with resulting increased sensitivity of seeds to R treatment and GA 3 penetration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer dark storage increased secondary dormancy and reduced sensitivity to red light and growth promoters.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Grand Rapidse0
Treatment
Increasing the period of dark storagee0
Outcome
degree of secondary dormancye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the period of dark storage (DS) within a uniform seed lot of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Grand Rapids) increased the degree of secondary dormancy (skotodormancy) induced, as evidenced by a loss of sensitivity to red light (R) and growth promoters such as gibberellin A 3 (GA 3 ), kinetin, thiourea, and ethylene.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed lots differed in induced skotodormancy, ordered I below II below III.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
skotodormancye0
Qualifier
lot I < lot II < lot IIIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differential degrees of skotodormancy were induced in lettuce seeds from three different sources (lot I < lot II < lot III).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light increased germination following acid immersion and rinsing.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Re0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
pH ≤ 3.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Either R or GA 3 significantly increased the germination of skotodormant seeds if seeds were first immersed in strongly acidic solutions (pH ≤ 3.0) and then rinsed with water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 3 increased germination following acid immersion and rinsing.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
GA 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
pH ≤ 3.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Either R or GA 3 significantly increased the germination of skotodormant seeds if seeds were first immersed in strongly acidic solutions (pH ≤ 3.0) and then rinsed with water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination promotion by red light and GA 3 rose with acidity and dark storage duration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
increasing aciditye0
Outcome
Promotion of germinatione0
Direction
positively relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Promotion of germination by R or GA 3 was positively related to increasing acidity, and also to the duration of DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid response varied by seed lot, with one second effective in some.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Sensitivity of the germination responsee0
Value
1 se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sensitivity of the germination response to acid immersion varied with the seed lots, as little as 1 s being effective with some seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 21 days dark storage, acid followed by usual red light and GA 3 produced only 10% germination in lot III.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
acid immersion followed by usual R and GA 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
onlye0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
21 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extended DS (21 days) produced such pronounced skotodormancy (seed lot III) that acid immersion followed by usual R and GA 3 produced only 10% germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous red light produced complete germination in otherwise dormant seeds.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Continuous Re0
Outcome
complete germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous R or a seed-piercing treatment produced complete germination in otherwise skotodormant seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed piercing produced complete germination in otherwise dormant seeds.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
seed-piercing treatmente0
Outcome
complete germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous R or a seed-piercing treatment produced complete germination in otherwise skotodormant seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid did not restore germination responsiveness to thiourea, kinetin or ethylene.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
treatment with acide0
Outcome
Responsiveness of germination to thiourea, kinetin, and ethylenee0
Direction
not regainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Responsiveness of germination to thiourea, kinetin, and ethylene, however, was not regained by treatment with acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid immersion appears to weaken endosperm membrane barriers and increase responsiveness to red light and GA 3 penetration.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Acid-immersion treatmentse0
Outcome
increased sensitivity of seeds to R treatment and GA 3 penetratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acid-immersion treatments appear primarily to weaken membrane barriers of the endosperm cells, with resulting increased sensitivity of seeds to R treatment and GA 3 penetration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1734 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce seeds (Lactuca sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

45 papers: 36 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.