Paper · 1993 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Short‐ and Long‐Term Phosphorus Dynamics in a Fertilized Ultisol under Sugarcane

B. Ball‐Coelho; H. Tiessen; J. W. B. Stewart; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In Brazilian sugarcane production systems, P fertilizer represents a substantial input cost, yet it is used with low efficiency. Furthermore, extractants currently used to estimate available P in highly weathered soils are not satisfactory. Understanding soil P transformations is a prerequisite to improving estimates of available P and fertilizer use efficiency. We used a sequential P fractionation procedure to examine short‐term dynamics of P from fertilizer, residue returns, and soil, and long‐term changes in forms and quantities of soil P as a result of fertilization. Mulch and burn systems of residue management were imposed as treatments in field‐grown sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) in northeast Brazil. Both treatments had similar inputs of P from residues (8.7 kg ha −1 ) but, despite the higher “available” P content of the ashes, more of the added P was mobilized and taken up by the plant in the mulch system, probably due to the presence of roots within the decomposing litter and more intense root exploration of the topsoil as a result of an improved moisture regime. This improved moisture and P supply was reflected in a 45% higher ratoon yield in the mulch treatment. Fertilizer P applied in a furrow 20 cm deep with the plant crop was concentrated in the more labile fractions, and had a residual effect on the first ratoon of about 30%. Over the long term (10 yr) there was accumulation (about 144 kg ha −1 ) of fertilizer P in the top 30 cm (in both labile and stable fractions). Nearly one‐half of the increase was in the first 7.5 cm of soil, a reflection of limited mixing of broadcast applications and uptake from the 7.5‐ to 15‐cm layer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching mobilized more added phosphorus for sugarcane uptake than burning.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mulch systeme0
Outcome
added P was mobilized and taken up by the plante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
burn systemse1

Verbatim

e0

“more of the added P was mobilized and taken up by the plant in the mulch system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulch and burn systems of residue management were imposed as treatments in field‐grown sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yield was 45% higher under mulching.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Outcome
ratoon yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
burn systemse1

Verbatim

e0

“a 45% higher ratoon yield in the mulch treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulch and burn systems of residue management were imposed as treatments in field‐grown sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–711 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow-applied fertilizer phosphorus was concentrated in more labile fractions.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Fertilizer P applied in a furrow 20 cm deepe0
Outcome
concentrated in the more labile fractionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer P applied in a furrow 20 cm deep with the plant crop was concentrated in the more labile fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“under Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow-applied phosphorus had about a 30% residual effect on the first ratoon.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Fertilizer P applied in a furrow 20 cm deepe1
Outcome
residual effect on the first ratoone0
Value
about 30%e0

Verbatim

e0

“had a residual effect on the first ratoon of about 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer P applied in a furrow 20 cm deep with the plant crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“under Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 10 years, about 144 kg ha −1 of fertilizer phosphorus accumulated in the top 30 cm of soil.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
fertilizer P in the top 30 cme0
Direction
accumulatione0
Value
about 144 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
Over the long term (10 yr)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Over the long term (10 yr) there was accumulation (about 144 kg ha −1 ) of fertilizer P in the top 30 cm (in both labile and stable fractions)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“under Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nearly half of the phosphorus increase was in the first 7.5 cm of soil.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
increase was in the first 7.5 cm of soile0
Value
Nearly one‐halfe0

Verbatim

e0

“Nearly one‐half of the increase was in the first 7.5 cm of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“under Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–80 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.