Abstract
The aims of correct irrigation scheduling are to produce the optimum yield and to apply water efficiently. An experiment was conducted during 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19 at research farm of Genda Singh Sugarcane Breeding and Research Institute, Seorahi, Uttar Pradesh under AICRP on sugarcane. The experiment consist of four combination of planting methods and mulching practices i.e. (P1) conventional flat planting 75 cm row spacing with organic mulch @6 t/ha, (P2) conventional flat planting 75 cm row spacing without mulch, (P3) paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha and (P4) paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch and three irrigation schedule (IW/CPE) with irrigation water depth 7.5 cm i.e. I1- 0.60, I2- 0.80 and I3- 1.00 were tested in strip plot design with three replications. Recommended dose of N:P:K ratio was 180:80:60 kg per hectare and applied before onset of monsoon. The experimental field was medium in organic carbon, medium in available phosphorus and low in potash with pH 8.15. Sugarcane variety CoSe 11453 was planted in spring season. The experimental findings on the basis of pooled data of three years showed that paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha recorded significantly higher germination per cent (56.18), shoot population (166.20 thousand ha-1), NMC (124.46 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (106.59 t/hectare) over remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment. Lowest cane yield (72.85 t ha-1) was obtained in conventional flat planting 75 cm row spacing without mulch. Irrigation scheduling IW/CPE 1.0 ratio recorded significantly higher germination (53.10 per cent), shoot population (164.89 thousand ha-1), NMC (116.76 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (101.85 t ha-1) over remaining irrigation scheduling. Sucrose per cent was not affected significantly due to different treatments of irrigation schedules and planting methods. Water productivity was recorded maximum in paired row 120:30 cm spacing trench planting with organic mulch @6t/ha (7.04 q/ha-cm) and 6.47 q/ha-cm in IW/CPE ratio 1.0 irrigation schedule.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Paired row trench planting with organic mulch gave 56.18 germination per cent, significantly above most planting treatments.
Verbatim
e0“paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha recorded significantly higher germination per cent (56.18), shoot population (166.20 thousand ha-1), NMC (124.46 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (106.59 t/hectare) over remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The mulched paired row trench treatment gave 166.20 thousand ha-1 shoots, significantly above most planting treatments.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/hae0
- Outcome
- shoot populatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 166.20 thousand ha-1e0
- Comparator
- remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatmente0
Verbatim
e0“paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha recorded significantly higher germination per cent (56.18), shoot population (166.20 thousand ha-1), NMC (124.46 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (106.59 t/hectare) over remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The mulched paired row trench treatment gave NMC of 124.46 thousand ha-1, significantly above most planting treatments.
Verbatim
e0“paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha recorded significantly higher germination per cent (56.18), shoot population (166.20 thousand ha-1), NMC (124.46 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (106.59 t/hectare) over remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The mulched paired row trench treatment yielded 106.59 t/hectare, significantly above most planting treatments.
Verbatim
e0“paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing with organic mulch @ 6 t/ha recorded significantly higher germination per cent (56.18), shoot population (166.20 thousand ha-1), NMC (124.46 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (106.59 t/hectare) over remaining treatments of planting methods except paired row trench planting 120:30 cm row spacing without mulch treatment.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional flat planting without mulch had the lowest cane yield, 72.85 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- conventional flat planting 75 cm row spacing without mulche0
- Outcome
- cane yielde0
- Direction
- Loweste0
- Value
- 72.85 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Lowest cane yield (72.85 t ha-1) was obtained in conventional flat planting 75 cm row spacing without mulch.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
IW/CPE 1.0 gave significantly higher germination of 53.10 per cent than other irrigation schedules.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation scheduling IW/CPE 1.0 ratio recorded significantly higher germination (53.10 per cent), shoot population (164.89 thousand ha-1), NMC (116.76 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (101.85 t ha-1) over remaining irrigation scheduling.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
IW/CPE 1.0 gave significantly higher shoot population of 164.89 thousand ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation scheduling IW/CPE 1.0 ratio recorded significantly higher germination (53.10 per cent), shoot population (164.89 thousand ha-1), NMC (116.76 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (101.85 t ha-1) over remaining irrigation scheduling.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
IW/CPE 1.0 gave significantly higher NMC of 116.76 thousand ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation scheduling IW/CPE 1.0 ratio recorded significantly higher germination (53.10 per cent), shoot population (164.89 thousand ha-1), NMC (116.76 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (101.85 t ha-1) over remaining irrigation scheduling.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
IW/CPE 1.0 gave significantly higher cane yield of 101.85 t ha-1.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation scheduling IW/CPE 1.0 ratio recorded significantly higher germination (53.10 per cent), shoot population (164.89 thousand ha-1), NMC (116.76 thousand ha-1) and cane yield (101.85 t ha-1) over remaining irrigation scheduling.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Sucrose percentage did not differ significantly among irrigation schedules.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sucrose per cent was not affected significantly due to different treatments of irrigation schedules and planting methods.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Sucrose percentage did not differ significantly among planting methods.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Sucrose per cent was not affected significantly due to different treatments of irrigation schedules and planting methods.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulched paired row trench planting gave maximum water productivity of 7.04 q/ha-cm.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- paired row 120:30 cm spacing trench planting with organic mulch @6t/hae0
- Outcome
- Water productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 7.04 q/ha-cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Water productivity was recorded maximum in paired row 120:30 cm spacing trench planting with organic mulch @6t/ha (7.04 q/ha-cm) and 6.47 q/ha-cm in IW/CPE ratio 1.0 irrigation schedule.”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
IW/CPE ratio 1.0 gave water productivity of 6.47 q/ha-cm.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- IW/CPE ratio 1.0 irrigation schedulee0
- Outcome
- Water productivitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 6.47 q/ha-cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Water productivity was recorded maximum in paired row 120:30 cm spacing trench planting with organic mulch @6t/ha (7.04 q/ha-cm) and 6.47 q/ha-cm in IW/CPE ratio 1.0 irrigation schedule.”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
organic · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
density · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →density · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →mulching · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →density · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →organic · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.